Jump to content

User talk:85.255.236.132

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abubakar Al-Mass have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 12:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Snidester. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hartlepool United F.C. seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hartlepool United F.C.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Snidester (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Scott Brown has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Microsoft Visual Studio Express, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]