User talk:8i347g8gl

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 8i347g8gl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rupert Sheldrake may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

8i347g8gl, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi 8i347g8gl! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheldrake article[edit]

Your changes to Rupert Sheldrake appear inappropriate for reasons I mentioned at the talk page. I asked you to make your case before reverting a second time, but you ignored my request and have continued to add material. Please explain yourself at the talk page, thanks. Tahknis (talk) 23:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#8i347g8gl regarding your edits. The discussion is about the topic Rupert Sheldrake. Thank you. —Tahknis (talk) 10:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring, disruptive editing and repeated addition of original research, as you did at Rupert Sheldrake. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mass–energy equivalence, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 08:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note - with that edit you also removed some content from the article. Please, per wp:BRD, discuss on the article talk page before you revert again. Thanks - DVdm (talk) 08:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Mass–energy equivalence. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 08:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Mass–energy equivalence. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mass–energy equivalence. DVdm (talk) 09:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are valid reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]