Jump to content

User talk:97.98.78.51

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slider-crank linkage has been accepted

[edit]
Slider-crank linkage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at four-bar linkage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mircea Gradu (April 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, 97.98.78.51! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quek157 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Quek157 (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ICPAT (May 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Triptothecottage was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Triptothecottage (talk) 04:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quek157 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Quek157 (talk) 18:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 06:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Draft:Texas Research Initiatives has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hut 8.5 21:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


I adapted material from State of Texas bills, which is in the public domain. Could you please reverse the deletion of the Texas Research Initiatives draft?

Um, no. This, this and this, for instance, are not Texas laws, but you copied liberally from all three. Works of the Government of Texas are not automatically in the public domain. Hut 8.5 21:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The sources at the time of deletion were: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Hut 8.5 16:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Texas-California rivalry has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Texas-California rivalry. Thanks! Nosebagbear (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Texas-California rivalry (July 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Texas Research Initiatives (August 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 97.98.78.51. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Texas Research Initiatives".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion to change my contributions

[edit]

Dear 97.98.78.51,

I am aware that some of my contributions are "duplicated", most of the cases I am improving the quality of the available options.

Thanks for your concern, --Nicoguaro (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Texas Research Initiatives, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]