User talk:AdiSingh007

June 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raghuraj Pratap Singh, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of battles of Rajasthan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

AdiSingh007, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AdiSingh007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Battle of Kakkor

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Kakkor, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.66970/2015.66970.Thirty-Decisive-Battles-Of-Jaipur_djvu.txt, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Kakkor and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Battle of Kakkor, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Kakkor. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of Kakkor with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Kakkor saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 14:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Siege of forts of Barwara and Tonk (1757) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Siege of forts of Barwara and Tonk (1757), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition, current sourcing does not have enough information to pass WP:VERIFY.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of battles of Rajasthan. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Kakor (1759) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Kakor (1759) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Kakor (1759) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Slatersteven (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Khatu Shyamji

The article Battle of Khatu Shyamji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG, and not found "Battle of Khatu Shyamji" in any of the WP:RS. We are not inventing names for battles here with battle of X, as it was happened at X.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imperial^[AFCND] 10:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Fatehpur (1799)

The article Battle of Fatehpur (1799) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not found any WP:RS mentioning "Battle of Fatehpur" between the Rajputs and Marathas. Fails WP:GNG, and the author just invented a name for a military conflict as "Battle of X", which is not accepted by MILHIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imperial^[AFCND] 10:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Siege of Barwara (1757) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Barwara (1757) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Barwara (1757) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 09:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)