User talk:AdvayP

May 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Daulatabad Fort—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ellora Caves. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How changing the information to keep it up to date in vandalism? AdvayP (talk) 11:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See below. Wikipedia follows its own name convention. Please do respect that. Materialscientist (talk) 11:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never disrespected that. Many articles have Bengaluru writen though the main city article still has Bangalore in it. Why same cannot be for Sambhajinagar. AdvayP (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I atleast change the place were city is mentioned? Don't know why u love the old names. AdvayP (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the article Aurangabad district, Maharashtra stays under its name, do not change that name in other articles. Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why. The name is officially changed. Instead I'll suggest to change Aurangabad District articles name please. Help us to keep Wikipedia up to date. AdvayP (talk) 11:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ellora Caves, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ellora Caves was changed by AdvayP (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959787 on 2023-05-02T11:20:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for unblock is to make wikipedia up to date and go against the hypocrisy the media. AdvayP (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry formy misunderstanding. I'll will not do it again and instead help Wikipedia to improve. Please unblock me. U can block me again if found doing it again:) AdvayP (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me. I asure u that I will not practice any kind of "vandalism" in the future.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdvayP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here AdvayP (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

By saying you want to "go against the hypocrisy the media", you are sort of admitting you have an agenda, a perception not altered in the slightest by how many of your edits to article space have been reverted. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. AdvayP (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

Please sign in to your account before making an unblock request. WP:GAB contains useful information which you should read before doing so. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdvayP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not do any kind of stuff which I did duw to which my account is banned. Sorry for my mistakes.

Decline reason:

Please tell us specifically what it is that you won't do again, to demonstrate your understanding. 331dot (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, for proper discussion flow. 331dot (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]