User talk:Aisamiscool8315

This is Aisamiscool8315's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

i hate Wikipedia, cry about it -- --> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aisamiscool8315/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aisamiscool8315! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Aisamiscool8315/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Aisamiscool8315. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Aisamiscool8315/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Aisamgamer8315 Show (May 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Aisamgamer8315 Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Aisamiscool8315. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page raft:The Aisamgamer8315 Show, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 13:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Aisamgamer8315 Show (June 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MPGuy2824 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Aisamgamer8315 Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No refs = no article[edit]

Unless people with no connection to the show are publishing about the show, i.e., references, there is no reason this can be accepted as an article. Please stop submitting it. David notMD (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Aisamiscool8315/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Aisamiscool8315. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 60 Seconds!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why would you do that? Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Aisamgamer8315 Show (August 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spot Goes To Hollywood, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 08:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there was supposed to be an SNES version Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 15:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter, you still need a reliable source. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 15:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

search it up Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide the source when you add the information, not on other editors. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

>:( Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this is the reason why i hate Wikipedia Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 07:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

did you just delete my reply Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding unsourced content - see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 18:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro, leave me alone because the gamecube port got cancelled because of less buttons, search it up, and i'm not adding unsourced content Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 07:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are a hypocrite, because you keep breaking my guidelines Aisamiscool8315 (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 17:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

You have been blocked for one week from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]