User talk:Alekh99

Recent edit to Neolamarckia cadamba

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neolamarckia cadamba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alekh99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Alekh99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which has a button "Cite" click on it
Then click on "Automatic" or "Manual"
For Manual: Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details, then click "Insert"
For Automatic: Paste the URL or PMID/PMC and click "Generate" and if the article is available on PubMed Central, Citoid will populate a citation which can be inserted by clicking "Insert"

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Alekh99. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by MrClog (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Sharma (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suresh Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suresh Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I left an answer on the Talk page of Theroadislong, as that is where the content of the two articles from The Hindu were placed. David notMD (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the draft Suresh Sharma as written will not be accepted because it does not achieve Wikipedia's criteria for notability. While the text of the draft is about protecting trees, the references make clear that his interests in the trees are closely linked to his attempt to develop a diabetes cure. Same opinion on any draft about Kadam extract as a diabetes treatment, as it does not meet WP:MEDRS. I am not a reviewer, so I have no power to make a decision on this draft or any other draft. David notMD (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have deleted suresh sharma mention on neolamarckia cadamba page why please update me , as when the article has significant mention of kadam tree protection by suresh sharma Alekh99 (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neolamarckia cadamba : suresh sharma edit

The article which i mention for suresh sharma has a significant mention about his efforts of protecting kadam tree.Also wiki general notability guidelines states clearly that wiki needs significant coverage but does not need to be the main topic of source material . Alekh99 (talk) 17:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your material doesn't belong in the article's lead section. Please read a few other botany articles to see what sort of section you need to create. It probably is inappropriate to use your relative's name in the article. You need to understand and communicate in your edit the context surrounding your relative's campaign: was tree native or introduced to the area? why trees being cut? was campaign successful? how is that species important to that area of Rajasthan? Ecosystem? It's understandable that you wish to memorialise him, but article concerns a species of plant only.

The article has a Talk page which you must use for this discussion in future. WP:Edit warring is a prime offence which can have your account blocked. Discussion on article's Talk page is the way forward.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But previously in January this year I updated and asked how to upload a news article which is not avaliable online nobody guided.i ask you now please tell me how to upload the article which is not online. I understand i will create another section for this . Alekh99 (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also the campaign was successful i have the court order sheet with which clearly states that “ there should not be felling of kadam tree throughout the state of Rajasthan Alekh99 (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article you have used as a source is available online, here. However, it does not support the information you added here – it does not mention Neolamarckia cadamba but Mitragyna parvifolia, and says nothing about the campaign being successful. If the tree is in fact protected in Rajasthan, there has to be a secondary source stating that; in that case the information could be added to the article body (not the lede!) but probably without the text about who filed the writ, as that is not relevant to the article about the tree. --bonadea contributions talk 18:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will clear few things

1. This is the journalist fault that he writes Mitragyna parvifolia in bracket but before he wrote kadamb as neolamarckia cadamba callef in hindi as kadamb .

2.i have other article also in which at last you paragraph it is clearly mention that suresh sharma filed a writ to protect kadamb tree .https://www.thehindu.com/herbal cure for diabetes type II granted patent.

3. I have court order sheet also which states clearly that there should not be felling of kadam tree in the state of rajasthan.

4. I have a hindi language and a english language news article which cleary says about a successful campaign of banning of reckless cutting of kadam tree in rajasthan but these two article not available online .so please guide me how to upload these two article and court order sheet. Alekh99 (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The other news article is for my point 2 is as below:

1.Visit http://www.thehindu.com

2.sign up and then sign in

3. Search “Herbal cure for type II diabetes granted patent ::::Alekh99 (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also share your email i will mail you the articles which are not online and the court oder sheet Alekh99 (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use the article talk page and provide the details about the news articles there. Nothing needs to be emailed, or uploaded anywhere. --bonadea contributions talk 18:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks i will do the same Alekh99 (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to upload the article. You can cite it as a reference. See: In-line citations for how to do it. Note that the tree's status in Rajasthan may not be a top concern outside of that state, and a sacred grove of this plant is not of high interest for the article, being man-made, so keep your new addition very brief and confine it to the "cultural significance" section of the article.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will make brief edit in cultural significance Alekh99 (talk) 06:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring offence

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Memorializing Suresh Sharma

I have noticed that the addition which you have tried to make to the article Neolamarckia cadamba has also been made on the following websites in addition to Wikipedia:

Mindat.org

Revolvy.com

Wikivisually.com

I am not sure that your edits on those sites remained permanent, but please note that Wikipedia has its own set of standards, which may differ from other wiki-type websites which anyone may edit. Our oversight on Wikipedia is intended to be strong, as this is an encyclopedia. Anyone may edit, but you should be aware that edits which do not strengthen and improve the encyclopedia will not be able to stand.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about memorialising . It is a truth which i edited . Alekh99 (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Sharma (activist) (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suresh Sharma (activist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suresh Sharma (activist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Sharma (activist) (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suresh Sharma (activist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suresh Sharma (activist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Suresh Sharma (activist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Suresh Sharma (activist). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Sharma Reply

Firstly I need to ask whether you have any relationship to Suresh Sharma, in particularly are you his son Alekh Sharma? If so then you have a definite conflict of interest and you are contravening Wikipedia's guidelines. Secondly I tried to clarify the reasons for refusal in my comments, essentially it needs to be established that there is significant coverage about Suresh, not merely mentions in passing - such as the DNAIndia reference. Simply lodging a writ against the government to stop the logging of kadam tree does not make him notable. It would assist if access to those references were not blocked behind a subscription site. Dan arndt (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i am the son of suresh sharma and i am trying bring the truth to wikipedia as everybody trust wiki. Articles which are offline available have in depth coverage and i have mentioned them in 3 and 4 reference but why you people are satisfied even i asked to email but they that it should come on talk page now i will put what offline article sats on talk page of draft:Suresh Sharma (activist) Alekh99 (talk) 09:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Yes i am the son of suresh sharma and i am trying bring the truth to wikipedia as everybody trust wiki. Articles which are offline available have in depth coverage and i have mentioned them in 3 and 4 reference but why you people are not satisfied even i asked to email but they say that it should come on talk page now i will put what offline article sats on talk page of draft:Suresh Sharma (activist) Alekh99 (talk) 09:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Alekh99! You created a thread called Draft: Scientist Suresh Sharma at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alekh99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Suresh Sharma, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Alekh99! You created a thread called requesting to get volunteer for creating a page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]