User talk:AliCharlie898

AliCharlie898, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AliCharlie898! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AliCharlie898! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Empire AS ^Talk! 05:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NTELEVISION / WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing on that Doraemon article?

You seem to be making dozens of edits where you add and then remove the letter D. Is there a reason for this? { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 10:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Please stop messing about with articles as at Doraemon: Nobita and the Castle of the Undersea Devil Eagleash (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been 'blocked' indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AliCharlie898 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have to follow the guidelines provided by the WP but I have not follow it, sorry for that but the person have a second chance in which he could prove himself. I have understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, I will make productive contributions. Please for God sake and the articles which I have improved need me, I will follow all the Wikipedia laws and regulations, Please give me second chance.

Decline reason:

Attempting to game our restrictions by repeated tiny back-and-forth edits (I presume in order to reach 500 edits so that you may then edit extended confirmed articles) is very disruptive. Bishonen | tålk 11:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You haven’t addressed what was going on with your single letter edits. To me, this reeks of someone trying to game the system to get to 500 edits for extended confirmed status. only (talk) 11:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

| UNBLOCK REQUEST AGAIN (TRUTH) = In Doraemon article, I have been doing continuous edits to increase my edits that's it, Truth is that, I was in greed, at that time but now I will fully follow the Wikipedia rules to not do these disruptive edits again. I have understand what is my punishment, sorry for that, please don't waste my previous contributions which I have made to Wikipedia.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AliCharlie898 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator! The reason why I was blocked was because of my disruptive edits, in short: In Doraemon article, I have been doing continuous edits to increase my edits , Truth is that, I was in greed, at that time. I tried to game the system and I am aiming for 500 edits to become Extended Review Editor. I admit my mistake fully, but you can block/delete this account permanently, to give me second chance, with unblocking my IP so I can restart my journey of editing Wikipedia. Now I will fully follow the Wikipedia rules to not do disruptive edits again. I have understand what is my punishment, BIG SORRY FOR THAT, please don't waste my previous contributions which I have made to Wikipedia. You have right to Block/delete this account which had 417 edits but you have also right to give me second chance. I tell you the whole truth about that incident. I am very sorry for doing disruptive edit on DORAEMON Article. only and 331dot Back to the point: Q1. We need to know what constructive contributions you wish to make?

ANS. First of all, I wish to make a constructive contribution to Wikipedia which is useful and helpful rather than negative and unhelpful. I wish to make these type of contributions to Wikipedia on my loved articles. Just like Kuruluş: Osman, I am fan of this series, and many articles which I have able to do that.

Q2. We also like to know why you were so keen on getting to extended confirmed status?

ANS: I previously tell that I did disruptive editing on DORAEMON Article by removing D many times to reach up to 500 edits, I want to reach extended confirmed status was because of I'd like to show off 😅 means when I am a beginner 1 month ago, any person reverted my edits readily. When I reach 300 edits, I saw a change on that thing. That's all I have no other reason.

Q3. If you achieved that status, what were you planning to edit that you can't do as just a confirmed user?

Ans I previously in second question said that I started editing Wikipedia 1 month ago, I have no reason of editing as extended confirmed status, I previously also said that I will make constructive contributions to my loved articles, which are not bound to be edit as extended confirmed reviewer. It was just a show off thing (very sad to say that by the way), but now I knew the Wikipedia laws and regulations, I have to follow it and I also knew that Show off is nothing on Wikipedia, you just have to make useful and helpful contributions rather than negative and unhelpful contributions, that is the reason.

I have answered your question as a friend, that's all by me. God Bless You. AliCharlie898 (talk) 18:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're using Confirmed sock puppets, including NoNworkeR (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In order to "restart your journey", you need to be unblocked first. In order to do that, we need to know what constructive contributions you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to know why you were so keen on getting to extended confirmed status. If you achieved that status, what were you planning to edit that you can't do as just a confirmed user? only (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UnBlock Sock Puppets Issue

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AliCharlie898 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator! PLEASE HAVE MERCY ON ME, PLEASE UNBLOCK ME, PLEASE UNDERSTAND MY EMOTIONS, MY FEELINGS. PLEASE THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I AM REQUESTING UNBLOCK, PLEASE HAVE MERCY ON ME, HAVE MERCY ON ME.

Note: My Phone means in which I was blocked because of disruptive edits. Another Phone means in which I create an account.

My UnBlock Request has been blocked with a reason, that I used sock puppets, including NoNworkeR (talk · contribs) , I am going to tell you the truth. After the blocked on my account, My Phone in which I have logged into the account was not able to edit any article because of ban. When I logged out, I still not able to edit any article, because of my IP address blocked. Tomorrow, when I open Wikipedia on Another phone (NOTE: on another phone), I am able to edit Wikipedia, I become happy, that Wikipedia unblock me, but when I check My Phone in which IP address is blocked, I am still not able to edit any article. I thought that what is going on? On Another Phone, I created an account, and it was properly created, After that I thought that it was an error on My Phone (error means showing block), so I log in into the account which I have created on Another Phone on My Phone named as NoNworkeR (talk · contribs). BELIEVE ME, I SERIOUSLY not thought that I was using a sockpuppet account. After that, when I log in into the account on My Phone, I was able to edit, so I made first edit on Kuruluş: Osman, you can saw the edit history of that account. After 30 minutes, when I made edit, I was blocked on Another Phone also, On that Time, I saw a message of administrator , that you have been using sock puppet account and you are blocked, ON THAT TIME I realised that I was using an sockpuppet account, Please understand my emotions, I have realised on that time not previously. Kindly remove my UnBlock so I can restart my journey on Wikipedia. I seriously God promise, did not thought that I was using an sockpuppet account (I Repeat) because on Another Phone I was able to edit, so I thought that it was an error on My phone which is showing a block, so I make an account on Another Phone, after that when it is blocked, on that time I realised that it was an sockpuppet account. I can say the lie to make this request good but I did not do it , I say the TRUTH. Please read it carefully and understand my emotions, Wikipedia is like drug, when I am not able to edit it, my head become heavy and my eyes gone dark. Please i Repeat PLEASE UNBLOCK ME , I AM GOING TO DIE...

Decline reason:

The unblock request below shows a blatant misunderstanding of Wikipedia's sockpuppetry and account policies. I think your comments here about your obsession and such doesn't help either. I'm going to take away talk page access and suggest that you take a standard offer. Go away for at least 6 months, don't edit with another account, and maybe you can be reconsidered for reinstatement down the road. only (talk) 21:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I won't formally decline your unblock request since I already declined your first request. I'll leave that to another admin. However, your request is... not sure what to call it. It's no good. You, you personally, the individual, are blocked. You are not allowed to create another account on another phone or in any other way. Your different phones aren't different people; a phone is not a person; it's the person that's blocked, because of disruptive editing. I'm sorry to hear you're so addicted to Wikipedia. I'm also rather surprised that you already feel this, after editing for barely one month. It makes me wonder if you had another account before. Did you create the AliCharlie898 account because a previous account was blocked? Please reply to this question below. Bishonen | tålk 14:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

No, God PROMISE, I have not create the AliCharlie898 account because a previous account was blocked. NO that's not a reason. You said that My request of unblock is not good but I tell the truth, and I can say the lie to make this request good but I did not do it , I say the TRUTH. I am seriously addicted to Wikipedia, I have so much free time to edit Wikipedia, but since when my account was blocked, I paralyzed, I dieeeeed.. AliCharlie898 (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock Me. I request you Administrator please for God's sake. I have received my punishment, please don't add more. AliCharlie898 (talk) 16:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

only (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]