User talk:AnaWitts

Welcome!

Hello, AnaWitts, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Venera Gimadieva, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eye snore 20:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Venera Gimadieva

The article Venera Gimadieva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eye snore 20:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Venera Gimadieva) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Venera Gimadieva, AnaWitts!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Added a single ref to avoid BLPPROD, Still needs additional references, and needs expansion. What is she notable for? What places has she worked, and what acts has she sung?

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Insert CleverPhrase Here 21:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please stop edit warring on the SS Princess Alice (1865)‎ article (See WP:BRD on how to act when your edits are reverted). If you wish to see the changes made, please use the article's talk page to DISCUSS the changes you would like to see implemented. - SchroCat (talk) 12:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at SS Princess Alice (1865)‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - SchroCat (talk) 12:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]