User talk:Andrea Parton

Welcome!

Hello Andrea Parton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 14:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Tags to Pages

I noticed that you added a style tag to the Collection agency page without adding any comment to the talk page. Would you care to add a comment to the page and explain what you think should be done to clean the page up and remove the style tag? Seanr451 20:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Jane Fonda

Hello. Good work on Jane Fonda, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in Jane Fonda? You can simply add links, preferably as inline citations, or see citation templates for different citation methods. Thanks!

chocolateboy 05:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wabash Cannonball

I came to welcome you after I saw your edits to this article, but I see that BlankVerse has already beaten me to the punch. Curses! Welcome just the same · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 22:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Conway

Hi! I saw you editing the Lynn Conway node and thought I'd say thanks for helping out. I'd love to improve that node but don't know how. She's kinda one of my heroes/mentors, and I think she deserves better but I don't want to just parrot her webpage. Also, yay left wing feminism! ♥ GeekGirlSarah ♥ 22:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yay, another friendly transwoman on Wikipedia! You could add the transsexual userbox to your user page! Also, I'm kind of hoping to actually add more content on Dr. Conway's engineering work and such, not so much on her activism. Maybe I should start by making dynamic instruction scheduling, but that'll require a lot of research that I don't have time to do tonight or tomorrow. ♥ GeekGirlSarah ♥ 01:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

McCloskey

Hi there. About the article on Deirdre McCloskey and the pronouns - we debated that on IRC, and concluded that since (prior to the surgery) McCloskey was male, the male pronoun was appropriate for that sentence.

After all, he is the one who had the surgery and became female. If she had had the surgery, would it not have resulted in becoming male?

I'll hold off on reverting the article until hearing from you. DS 16:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh, and,,,

don't forget - sign your messages on talk pages! DS 16:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

IRC is realtime chat (using a variety of free clients such as mIRC for Windows or IRCle for Mac - once you've got the program open, type /server irc.freenode.net, select a nick, and then type /join #wikipedia), not a webforum; as such, there's no "page" (although I believe I have the McCloskey conversation logged if you'd like me to e-mail it to you).

You're welcome to drop by; there are a number of TS/TG people there, in fact. DS 17:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transsexuality

Hi Andrea. Thanks for the comment! I agree with your partial revert in this case. Re. featured article, it'd be nice to see it happen and if there's anything I can do, I will. BTW - TS here also :-) - Alison aka Ali-oops ^✍ 02:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the page move. Can we put up a voting request similar to the one on here and gain consensus? - Ali-oops ^✍ 02:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrea. I'm the mystic IP address who contributed the TS page. I myself prefer the term "transgendered", since the issue indeed is about gender identity and not sexual issues. I am myself a M2F TS who transitioned some 10 years ago and has been in the woodwork since.. I'd rather keep my identity anonymous, hence mere IP address rather than username.

Circumcision Userbox

You may find a userfied version of the deleted box in my user space at User:Tomyumgoong/ubx/nocirc, feel free to subst or transclude it if you wish. Tomyumgoong 20:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succession Box location on the page

You may want to enter this discussion: Template_talk:Succession_box#Box_location_discussion_or_style_guide_or_policy.3F. per your remarks on Jane Fonda Doc 04:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I just read your message NOW. Well, the reason why I placed the succession box at the bottom of the page is for consistency. I started editing the pages beginning with the most recent winner (Reese Witherspoon) and the succession box in that article was at the bottom, which is also quite consistent with other articles (see NBA players), because it is usually grouped together with templates (see sports articles). I must admit that I'm not so certain when this is applied to film luminaries, but the main reason I edited these pages was not to move them at the bottom, but to add the film title wherein they earned the citation. So instead of reverting back to the pages before I edited them, it will be better if the succession box (with the film title) is just moved to the filmography section. Still, there has to be some consensus on whether to put the succession box at the bottom or to just placed it at some section.Joey80 06:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User_talk:Joey80. Arniep 12:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! While editing some other pages, some editors pointed out that a succession box might not be appropriate in such instances as awardees (like in the Oscars). This is a winner in the next year does not necessarily succeed the winner this year (like calling this year's winner an "ex-Oscar winner"), like a head of a country or an institution. So I'm beginning to think that since a template was used to tie all the Best Picture winners, maybe a template can also be used to tie all the winners in the same category. What do you say? Of course, being a template, it means putting it at the bottom of a page, so that will not cause that much trouble.Joey80 08:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Sex was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 05:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Conway

As per personal e-mail from Lynn Conway herself, her date of birth was not in 1937: "I was not born in 1937 and have no idea how that incorrect date got in there." Out of curiosity, where'd you get that information? DS 19:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autism analogy

I was making an analogy with autism in the sense that danah boyd's essay "Autistic Social Software" does; I think that saying that people shouldn't be expected to act like an autistic person in order to contribute to Wikipedia isn't the same as saying that all autistic people are asocial (for a silly analogy to that: saying that bicycles shouldn't be considered as a bad transportation option because some people are disabled isn't the same as saying that all disabled people can't ride bicycles.) Catamorphism 20:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Triweekly

If you want to change it to "three times a week" I'll accept the change. Dispite the dual meaning of 'triweekly' I felt it sounded better and I think when most people hear triweekly they think of three times per week. I had considered writing 'three times a week' but to me it really lacks articulation and seems a bit amateur. Still, it's probably a more acurate way of stating it. I just wish there were a better way of saying it.

Children of transpeople

The entire paragraph was basically unsourced and was making broad derogratory allegations about transpeople in general. While I have no doubt that that has happened to some, the paragraph as it read was like something out of an fundamentalist "ex-transsexual" organisation's publication. Rebecca 03:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi! How are you? I am a fellow Wikipedian with ASD. I would like to know more about you. Thanks! --Sjsharksrs 12:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am only a 16 years old student. I managed to be mainstreamed in school. I am really pleased to meet you. That's all about me. :D Sjsharksrs 08:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German Wiki

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/24._September_2006#Kategorie:Wikipedian_unterst.C3.BCtzt_Lesben-_und_Schwulenbewegung_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29

Some people try to delete category:Wikipedian support gay community: please help GLGerman 14:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mylifesofar.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mylifesofar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Arniep 22:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC) -- Arniep 22:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Hi Andrea, it's not a war. I was wrong, I made wrong templates adapting bond movies box navigation to other actors filmographies templates because I didn't know how to create it, but I didn't know that, and an user reverted it but he, too, didn't say to me what was wrong; but now he'd talked to me about that problem and I learned how to fix it. I have already corrected the templates, creating right ones. Machocarioca 02:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)machocarioca[reply]

Mediation

Thank you for stepping in as a mediator. I didn't want to be stuck in an edit war, and I am, and was fully aware of his position, and what he was trying to get at... I just didn't feel it were appropriately phrased. I think you understand/understood that, and I hope we can come up with an edit that is both appropriate and accurate for the article, even if it's not what I kept reverting to. --Puellanivis 16:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine (song)

Thanks for catching my (unintentional) mistake on the Imagine (song) article. I think I must have got a bit mixed up when expanding the paragraph on Peter Gabriel's version to include Stevie Wonder's earlier version. Anyway, thanks. --BlueCanary 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TS entry

Apologies if this comment is in the wrong place but I simply wanted to communicate and explain some edits made to the page on transsexualism (and its etiology). While there are several statements to the fact that the cause of transsexualism is unknown, a number of passages very much appear to promote the view that it has biological cause.* I have tried to correct for this, while retaining as much of the original content as possible.

One of the five pillars that form the foundation for all Wikipedia policies and guidelines is Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. In a nutshell, this means all Wikipedia articles must be written from a detached standpoint, representing views fairly and without bias. This includes all the types of pages in the encyclopedia (articles, maps, reader-facing templates, categories, and portals, etc.).

Removal of my suggestion

I would like your opinion about the notion that I was "spamming" you by leaving you a message on your Talk page (which was, in turn, deleted by another user who determined it to be spam). Please comment, if you'd like, under my question for the folks at WikiProject Spam. Seems to me that they're going a bit too far censoring Wikipedia users from even TALKING to each other on a Talk page, if there's an external link involved. Was I helpful to you at all, or nothing but an annoyance? --JossBuckle Swami 17:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from a transsexual friend

Hi Andrea, my name is Hank, a new Wikipedian. As I was putting myself into various categories and looking other people's Userpages to learn how to make my own, I saw your Userpage and from the first moment, I just knew I wanted to get to know you more, since we had quite a number of things in common (liberalism, environmentalism, feminism, transsexuality, for example). Look Andrea, I need your help because I need some information regarding transsexuality (since you are yourself a transsexual and you made a major contribution to the article on it). I see myself as a transsexual---I was born a male and now I remain a male, even though I don't like being a male and desire to be a female. From your Userboxes I can see that you are a transwoman. The thing I want to know, Andrea, is whether or not you are completely feminized? I mean, now you are a female, but do you still have any trace of maleness left? Sorry to ask you such a personal question. Since I am myself queer, I feel quite embarrassing to not know about the queer community that well, even though I see myself as one of the community. I know no queer people around me, that's why. Thanks very much! --Cantaire87 05:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WP:LGBT

Hi, Andrea! I noticed some of your edits and suchlike and wondered if you would be interested in joining the LGBT WikiProject? Stop on by, take a look around, and if you like, sign up on our membership page. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Cantaire87

Hi Andrea! I happened to have time today so I am able to reply your note, and I think I am able to afford a couple of more exchanges of notes as well. In late March and whole April, however, I will be too busy again but I think I will have time in May.

I am glad that I am finally able to communicate with a LGBT person! :) Thanks so much for willing to communicate. Where shall we start?

The thing about my transsexuality is, it is questionable, under much stricter definitions (which I am against---I am in favor of flexible definitions). As much as I want to be a woman and feel highly interested in everything feminine, it is still really likely that I will choose to remain non-op (some people just deny that non-op people are trans). Why? practical reasons such as the finanical one compose a big factor, but I guess the ultimate reason is that I want more than a social female gender role---I want to get a biological one, too. For example, I want to get pregnant, give birth, and breastfeed. Current medical technology does not allow that, so as much as I am depressed, I may choose to not use it for transition at all, since it offers no cure for my suffering. (Important Note: I am not denying the fact that transwomen are women, even though they can't carry out biological roles. For me, social roles are enough to make a woman, but I still want more than that.)

So what is my solution of finding relief to the problem without a cure? I awake my female self and learn to tolerate the male self. It actually worked, to some extent. I'd created a literary world through writing and am living in it as a woman, a female voice. I feel comfortable when writing as a female voice, and it impressed my English teachers (I once wrote a poem as 19th-century woman who suffers from domestic abuse in male-dominated Victorian Britain, and my teacher commented that it was a really risky move. After she had read the poem, however, she was so impressed because she thought I'd really captured the woman's voice. What she didn't know is, I WAS that woman, so it was no risky move for me. It came to me quite naturally. Would you like to see the poem, by the way? You as a feminist might be interested.)

Okay, this note is already quite long, so I will end it just in case you don't like reading long notes. So, what do you think, Andrea? How much happiness do you obtain from your transition? Can you tell me more about your experiences? --Cantaire87 20:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To dear Andrea

Dear Andrea, I am so sorry that I'd made you cry. I shouldn't had asked you about the details of your transition if it was indeed that painful and horrific for you. It's okay Andrea, we have so many queer friends and allies all around the globe fighting for our cause, and things will be better and brighter in the future. I myself was involved in an human rights organization called National Coalition Building Institute, and we were----and still are---trying to break down the barriers between different groups for friendship and understanding. I just wish I could fly to your side and give you a big hug to make you feel better. I totally accept who you are and see you as a woman and sister, Andrea, even if your progress for full transition was hindered.

I also want to thank you for confirming my queer status, since I do feel a sense of belonging to the queer community. :) Thanks, too, for telling me about Andrea James, and I really liked her website. By the way, when you and Andrea James are saying "coming-out", I am not sure what you meant. I thought "coming-out" meant revealation. Am I right?

Anyway, here is my poem I talked about last time (By the way, thanks for not minding reading long posts----you know I just love writing. I don't mind reading long posts, too----I like reading):

A 19th-century Woman's Desparate Cry

Stop, John!

Do you know how much I am hurt inside?

Stop, John!

At least please do stop in front of the children's sight!

Stop, John!

You restrictions on me are too tight!

Stop, John!

You are simply not doing it right!

On the very moment I became your wife,

I destroyed my identity totally to surrender to your love.

I was hoping for a new rebirth,

To become a happy woman who would be fully enjoying her life...

At first you were very tender,

Always providing me warmth with your embrace when I shiver.

To have a happy familiy with several children was your dream,

And here we are----now you are three children's father...

Both you and I loved the color of orange,

And so did our little George.

Our family had so many things in common,

I always wanted to write these happy memories down in a clean page...

Suddenly things had began to change,

Alcohol had transformed you into a mad man with terrible rage.

I groaned and cried helplessly every time when you overwhelmed me,

And to me the home had become a cage...

As a woman I am your property,

You have the total control over me.

I can do nothing to help myself----

Like what I'd said, you have the total control over me...

I can hardly breathe because my corset is too tight,

Most of my dresses are cumbersome and unreasonably too wide.

Yet in this state of extreme physical discomfort I still have to suffer mentally,

To obey your stern orders without questions or die...

I am willing to submit myself totally to you because I still love you,

And with tears I beg you to love me too.

Please grant this wish to your poor little devoted slave,

Please grant this wish to your poor little devoted slave...

I wrote this poem after being inspired by a drawing I saw on a website. (to see it, follow the following link: http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Wmarriage.htm) I basically wanted to show, as many as I can, the sufferings a Victorian woman had to gone through, such as the loss of legal identity after marriage, total subordination to her husband, restrictive and cumbersome clothing, unstatisfied emotional needs, etc. I debated with myself while writing this poem's end: shall I revolt against my husband (as I'd stated last time, I was the woman while composing the poem), or shall I continue to submit to rigid Victorian male authority? I finally decided to submit, since as a woman I'd no means to support myself without John, and at the same time, as the Victorian ideal about women's roles dictated, I was still willing to love and care for John even John had no respect for me.

Any comments, Andrea? What do you think about my poem? --Cantaire87 22:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: If you prefer, I can interact with you as Hanna, my literary self. I know I'd introduced myself to you as Hank, but I would be glad to switch to my literary self (since we are penmates, we communicate by writing) when communicating with you. You can call me just by my name if you want----Cantaire87 is a much longer name to write.

From Hanna

Dear Andie, thanks for giving me an opportunity to introduce myself to you as a friend and sister! :) As Hank'd stated last time, I am Hanna, and I represent his Shakti and female voice. What do I mean by "Shakti"? Well, it certainly does not mean that Hank and I are "divine" in a sense like a Hindu god and his Shakti, it is just because after an examination of few similar concepts (such as anima and yin), we had decided that (according to our own understanding), the best word to represent my identity is "Shakti". True, without me, Hank will be just like a corpse in a way, since he believes his vital energy and all happiness ultimately comes from me, a woman, once I am awakened.

Despite of the risks of possibly earning himself the title of multiple personality disorder, Hank'd decided on my behalf (how sweet of him: he will do anything to defend me while the outsiders are calling him crazy, and he loves me and enjoys my companionship) to let me step out of my literary world and interact with you, since he knows how much do I long for a sister figure with the purpose of discovering more about myself as woman after my recent awakening. Will you accept me as a sister, dear Andie, as I am willing to accept you as mine? I believe that being the part of a sisterhood, like being a mother, is really important to a woman's identity. Certainly, it will help you as a woman a lot, too, I am sure.

We will have a great time together, Andie, I assure you. :) Hank, you and I all have much in common (such as feminism, environmentalism, etc.) and I look forward in the future to have exciting discussions with you on these interesting topics, and I am sure you are full of great insights.

Because of the busy schedule, I probably cannot talk with you again until May. See you then! With love from Hanna --Cantaire87 04:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deletion of article on Deep Stealth Productions

Per your request, I've restored the article and listed it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Stealth Productions. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Hanna

Hey Andie, it's Hanna. I finally have more time now, so now I have time not just to edit Wikipedia, but also talking to you, like what I'd said back in March. So how are you in these days? Any exciting new progress in your transition? How am I, you may wonder? Well, since I am a literary voice, I remained dormant in these days, because Hank simply didn't really have time to write. However, when Hank explored the Church and Wellesley queer community here at Toronto just a couple of days ago, I came alive. We were lost at first, but when we first saw a rainbow flag, a feeling of "we are home" actually formed. It confirmed my existence, even though I may remain dormant for a long period of time. And what an eye-opening experience to explore a queer community for the first time! Rainbow colors were almost everywhere, and there were also leather subculture people down there, too. Is there a queer community like this in Dallas? If I have a chance I want to explore San Fransciso's legendary queer community sometime in the future. :)

Andie, currently I am pretty concerned about environmental issues, and I am hoping perhaps that I can get some insights from you, since you are an environmentalist yourself. I am wondering about one important ethical question: Can ecoterrorism be justified? I mean, as extreme as terrorism is, we are talking about saving the whole Earth here. Can terrorism be used as a last resort when everything else fails, before it's too late to save the Earth (and our VERY OWN SURVIVAL as well as the survival of ALL OTHER LIFE)? (if you are unwilling to answer my question in my public talk page since you might fear that your answer is controversial since the issue is sensitive, just send a mail to my email-address: luohank87@yahoo.com. I am asking this for academic reasons only.) --Cantaire87 15:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC) (Sorry for forgetting to sign last time!)[reply]

Animal body disposal

Would you care to revisit this article you created way back when and see if there's some sources that could be cited? I've looked at it and just don't know what to do with it. 24.4.253.249 03:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Animal body disposal

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Animal body disposal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Addhoc 23:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Neil Sperry

A tag has been placed on Neil Sperry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calpernia Addams

Hi Andrea, just to let you know that I reverted your recent edit on the Calpernia Addams article because you removed a New York Times reference that was used further down the page, meaning that it effectively "broke" the second citation. I am not at all familiar with Calpernia Addams, and have no opinion on the edit you made otherwise. But if you remove that info again, please make sure the citation details are kept (I think it is for the quote further down). Thanks, --Beloved Freak 17:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Conway Mediation

Hi, I've accepted the 2008-06-01 Lynn Conway mediation case. Please feel welcome to participate and comment. BrownHornet21 (talk) 00:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amy Alkon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Amy Alkon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. El Ingles (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pervasive development orders

Ouch! Thanks for fixing my blooper, and for your speed at fixing it. Eubulides (talk) 17:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

was going through your edits and articles. Good material with a bit of minor problems according to my views :) hugs. Danger^Mouse (talk) 10:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No disrespect intended

I didn't mean to disrespect Dee Palmer.

Sorry.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I read the policy on Wikipedia. So Dee Palmer is referred to as 'she' when describing her stint in Jethro Hull correct?--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 02:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dee Palmer

Is there anything else I can do to improve Dee Palmer's page?

I added more info in the introduction.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Laura Miller

Hrm, I've just looked again, and I think I reverted more than I intended to do at the time. The article looks good now so I apologise for my rash behaviour. The line that I took issue with was the unsourced remark regarding her dealing with cancer: such things really need to be references in order to comply with WP:BLP. It looks to be referenced now so that's fine; sorry for the trouble. —Sean Whitton / 09:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas-area photographs

Andrea, do you have a digital camera? If so, and you have time, would you like to photograph some of the requests I placed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dallas? They include the headquarters of Southwest Airlines and AMRCorp and the Love and DFW airports. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Line breaks after headings

Why would you want to squeeze out these "unnecessary" spaces? They make it a lot easier to find sections. Dicklyon (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Medical model of disability

An article that you have been involved in editing, Medical model of disability , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Tcp-ip (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Hi Andrea! I know it's been quite sometime since you've edited. I do hope you'll see this cup of tea! I just wanted you to know that your contributions are valuable to making Wikipedia what it is, and I do hope you'll participate with a new edit or article. Thank you for your contributions - past and future! SarahStierch (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Come hang out with us!

Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, women in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Andrea Parton! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Andrea Parton! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review needs your help

Hi Andrea Parton,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrea Parton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aleshia Brevard

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I had to revert your recent changes to Aleshia Brevard for lack of a reliable source. Please refresh your memory about WP:BLP standards which are stricter than for other articles, and be sure to use impeccable sources when adding information about living or recently deceased people. The blog of an individual is not a reliable source and neither is Facebook unless it can be authenticated as being her own personal statement. Feel free to reinstall this information with a citation from a reliable source. Mathglot (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andrea Parton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrea Parton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrea Parton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Eat soap" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eat soap has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 29 § Eat soap until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]