User talk:Arsalanm110

February 2016

Welcome!

Hello, Arsalanm110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Bulls

Hi there. Thanks for your contributions on Buffalo Bulls. Be aware the subheadings for each individual sports team should also be general in nature, highlighting some of the history and accomplishments, like league titles and NCAA tournament appearances, as well as the head coach and the team's home venue. The article is an encyclopedia article, not a promotional website or brochure, and the topic is the athletic department as a whole. Season-by-season or selected highlights from the current or recent seasons generally aren't appropriate unless the events they mention were notable (i.e. an NCAA tournament appearance or a major upset that received significant coverage). Also, the word "alumni" is plural when speaking of men or a group of men and women. When speaking of an individual, the terms are "alumnus" for a male and "alumna" for a female (and "alumnae" for plural females). --JonRidinger (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Schematic representation of the rat wild-type UT receptor.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Schematic representation of the rat wild-type UT receptor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Template:PBB/57007 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Urotensin II-related peptide

A tag has been placed on Urotensin II-related peptide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Urotensin II-related peptide, from its old location at User:Arsalanm110/sandbox1. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 16:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urotensin II-related peptide has been accepted

Urotensin II-related peptide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tail suspension test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immobility. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Marble Burying Set Up.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marble Burying Set Up.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marble Burying Set Up.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marble Burying Set Up.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

I found your "Open Field Test " article draft because you categorized it before making it live. What a great concept - thanks for advancing Wikipedia's coverage of rodent science. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm still new so any constructive criticism is appreciated Arsalanm110 (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping me when any of your rodent-related articles are ready to move to the article mainspace. I would be happy to criticize any of them. They are already good. A few days ago I just published animal testing on Syrian hamsters which is how I found your drafts. I really am thrilled with what you are doing. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Light Dark Box Apparatus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Light Dark Box Apparatus.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arsalanm110. The situation here is that when a non-free media file seems to be owned by an organization, then Wikipedia needs to have an email on file from that organization saying that the picture is released. Since it seems that the first time this file had a free license was on Wikipedia, a representative of the organization would need to make the release by email according to these instructions. I could help with processing any part of this, if you like. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]