User talk:Assianir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]

Hello Assianir! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
Wikimedia.png

Categories[edit]

All the people that you are currently categorising as Tuscan, such as Fra Angelico, have already been categorised more precisely under people from Tuscany as being specifically from the Province of Florence. You will find them all there, if you look at the list. When categorising, it's generally advised to be specific if possible. I advise seeking more expert advice on this before proceeding. Amandajm (talk) 11:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree that a lot of the people that you have sorted into this category are famous as Tuscans. Some of the provinces, like Florence are well known, but, as you say, others are not. Don't change them back. If anyone complains, let me know. I think the bigger category is better thatn lots of small ones. Amandajm (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Leonardo[edit]

I've left a message on that talk page about his name. Perhaps you could have a chat to the head curator of the museum in Vinci, who has access to the records and would know exactly how Leonardo's father and grandfather referred to themselves. Amandajm (talk) 01:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

The Shawshank Redemption[edit]

Please stop adding links to common terms in this article, per WP:OVERLINK. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Ways to improve Che Ti Dice La Patria?[edit]

Hi, I'm Whiteghost.ink. Assianir, thanks for creating Che Ti Dice La Patria?!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Could you please add some references or footnotes? Without them we can't independently prove that the topic is genuine. And, if possible, could you add some info about the story itself? Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Hello again Assianir, I have added a little more information about the story, a reference and some links, including ones to The Complete Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway and Ernest Hemingway bibliography. As you say, other people will continue to improve this article. Thanks for creating it. You have made the The Hemingway articles more complete. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 23:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Grazie molto per la tazza di caffè! Sarebbe bello avere il tuo articolo in italiano Wikipedia. Puoi tradurre? Whiteghost.ink (talk) 08:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Despicable Me (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

units of measurement[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!--Wuerzele (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Assianir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Trasferimenti e itwikipedia[edit]

Anni fa implorai di accorpare le procedure di unione a quelle di cancellazione, usando la falsariga della procedura francese. Molte lingue hanno binari separati ma simili per le procedure, dell'ordine di qualche settimana. Va da sè che sul lungo periodo accorparle è la cosa più logica. Primo riduce manutenzione, secondo incrementa la visione comunitaria, terzo essendo l'unione una possibilità della PdC questo apre la porta a tutte le altre possibilità di PdC incluso... il trasferimento. Che quindi passa da una procedura visibile e standardizzata. Non solo, ma anche segnalabile ai progetti. Già adesso qualcuno fa il furbone e non segnala ma con altre procedure non c'è nemmeno il template di avviso.

Sai bene tuttavia che la razionalizzazione non sarà, di fondo, mai davvero fatta. Si dirà "burocrazia" o "non c'è fretta"/"le voci non scadono" (ma per cancellare due settimane bastano? ed è pure più drastica di unione. Per non parlare di trasferimento stesso) ma sai bene il motivo quale sarà.

Chi vuole "comandare" senza "lavorare" sui contenuti non vuole né partecipazione, né regole chiare. Vuole procedure oscure e farraginose da interpretare "caso per caso". Vuole che gli altri abbiano scarsa conoscenza delle opzioni così da sceglierne l'una o l'altra quando serve. Pensa solo al giochino di ruolo di opporsi al trasferimento o all'unione quando una voce va per essere cancellata ma proporle quando va per essere mantenuta, ti immagini se si seccasse questa arbitrarietà procedurale ad usum trollorum institutionalorum? Che giochini di ruolo lasceresti loro il pomeriggio? Ampliare le voci? Sarebbero sprecati, poveri figliouli :D Molto più divertente aspettare che qualcuno bussi alla loro talk implorando "clemenza".

La visione wiki, genuinamente collaborativa, o la si ha o no. Passino i sempliciotti, ma spettava a chi sa come va il mondo non imbarcare certa gente, invece di sponsorizzarla. E soprattutto non creare un sistema che tutela questi atteggiamenti. Oramai ci sta, quindi per parecchi anni ancora chiedere a itwikipedia di essere wiki a livello procedurale è di fondo inutile. Passeranno dall'indifferenza alla trollata, todo modo para buscar il diritto a non essere wiki e imporlo agli altri. Negazioni che questo avvenga o dichiarazioni di principio sono solo chiacchere--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

it:Wikipedia:Bar/Discussioni/Progetto:Attualità questa era un'idea fatta pure da me anni fa. All'epoca noooo, si doveva aspettare o giù di lì. Notevole constatare come itwikipedia arriva sempre in ritardo di anni. Quante voci e contenuti si potevano salvare e migliorare. Ma quanti giochini di ruolo si sono potuti fare, viva wikipedia in italiano :D--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)