User talk:Atarhe Okejotor

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nanyang Technological University, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Samsung Galaxy Note 20. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. NJD-DE (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me {{I have learnt my lessons and will not do such againAtarhe Okejotor (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:NC-logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NC-logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

News Centric moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, News Centric, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Newscentric.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Newscentric.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tofu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I removed your citation https://criticalinfo.com.ng/health/10-significant-health-benefits-of-the-tofu as it does not look like a reliable source. Tacyarg (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for spamming this website before. If you continue spamming your next block will be longer possibly indefinite. Lavalizard101 (talk) 19:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:News Centric[edit]

Hello, Atarhe Okejotor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:News Centric, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. White 720 (talk) 16:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --- Possibly ☎ 17:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 02:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spam-only account[edit]

criticalinfo.com.ng: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Despite your assurances otherwise, you apparently have not "learnt your lessons" after the first block. Further spam attempts from any other accounts will result in blacklisting of your site.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:News Centric[edit]

Hello, Atarhe Okejotor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "News Centric".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please help my IP address is blocked and my Wikipedia account is restricted.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atarhe Okejotor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have violated the terms of Wikipedia while trying to edit pages on Wikipedia which has led to the ban of my Wiki account as well as my IP address. I have learnt my lesson a hard way and I am pleading that my account privileges be restored while my IP be removed from the ban list. I promise to abide by the terms, rules or regulations of Wikipedia and to only make necessary and compulsory edits that will add value to the Wiki content itself. I know that if given my privileges back I won't get another chance as my indiscipline will be tolerated no longer. Please unban my account so I can make edits to events that have occurred in my country that have not been updated. Thanks in anticipation. Atarhe Okejotor (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked, not banned(there is a difference). You say you learned your lesson, but you don't say what the lesson is. Part of telling us that will involve you describing your connection to the subjects of your edits to this point, and telling what was wrong with your edits, only by doing this can we be convinced that your behavior will change. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were already given a second chance back in February, and you resumed doing the same thing again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atarhe Okejotor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please grant me this last wish and if I fail you can block my account permanently.

Decline reason:

One request open at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.