Jump to content

User talk:Atheist kerala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Atheist kerala, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Adakiko (talk) 11:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

[edit]

Please avoid bare URLs for reasons mentioned here: wp:bare URLs. See help:referencing for beginners. Also: wp:citation and wp:reliable sources. Personally, I prefer the wp:templates {{cite web}} for most websites, {{cite book}}, {{cite journal}} for journals and magazines. Click on those links to go to the (rather convoluted) documentation. For cite web, the fields |url=, |title=, |author=, |date=, |publisher=, |access-date= are good to fill in. If it is a non-English website, you can add a translated title and language |language=fa, (Persian) |trans-title=... If you think the link may go dead, you can use https://archive.today to archive a copy for the future. Some sites are not supported. How to add an archive is discussed on cite web. Thank you for your contributions! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Irreligion in India

[edit]

On your edit here at the bottom, I removed a space before a comma and capitalized "Islamic". I'd forget too, if I didn't have my spell checker turned on. English, for you... Adakiko (talk) 11:32, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you Atheist kerala (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamitha Teacher (December 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
─ The Aafī (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a friendly advice

[edit]
    • Greetings @ Atheist kerala


Main article namespace has higher level requirements of references. Editing without fulfilling all those requirements is unlikely to be accepted and you will keep wasting time and energy.

Wikipedia certainly needs help in article expansion help from users like you. Same time I would like to suggest some strategic patience so you do not end up exhausting your options.

You are suggested and most welcome to keep focusing and updating Draft:Ex-Muslims of Kerala with references slowly but steadily. Other editors will take appropriate info with refs from there to this main article namespaces at the right time until you have enough experience on Wikipedia editing.

  • At least know more what not to do, to not getting blocked or banned.
    • One needs to use third party references as much as possible.
    • If you yourself are part of management/ office bearer/ employee of any organization or website simply do not edit in own/their favor.
    • By any chance do not try to have/ use more than one user account.
    • Do not enter into edit wars at any point of time.
    • Where in doubt about content engage in discussions through talk pages ** Let not get any content dispute personalized at any point of time.

I hope my suggestions would help you positively, you will stay and enjoy editing Wikipedia.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 06:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help

[edit]

Greetings @ Atheist kerala,

Hello, This is User:Bookku again, By now you might have got to know a little about my Wikipedia wide interests. I find information and knowledge gaps create Drafts, try to recruit draft expanding editors and promote drafts and articles (my own and others) for further expansion.

Requesting your visit to following drafts pertaining to South Asia (& few others too) and help expand the same if any of these interests you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

=One more request=

[edit]

Greetings again,

Can you help by covering this Tamil Nadu Ex Muslim 'Aneesh Jasy's arrest news in The news minute

Thanks

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure, might be it find a place in ex Muslims article

Atheist kerala (talk)

About the persecution section

[edit]

@ Atheist kerala

It's okay to include persecution section in the article Ex-Muslims of Kerala. But you seem to have included blog references from freethoughtblogs. English Wikipedia traditions usually do not allow self published sources like blogs since they do not have inbuilt editorial counter check systems.

It would be preferable you look for some alternate sources instead of blog posts. May be you can try Malayalam language news sources with translation provided.

sure,but that content is only available in that site, will look for more sources

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 04:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid temptations of reverting edits

[edit]

Greetings @ Atheist kerala

Pl. avoid temptation of edit reverts among you and Keralafeminist, Both of you might think those being friendlier minor edit reverts but others will not miss their opportunity to block Ex Muslim supporting editors unwanted to them on a simple pretext. Just do not give chance to others.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 09:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok Atheist kerala (talk)

Stop Vandalism

[edit]

Don't revert edits without clear evidences. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

use talk page, you cannot keep a tag without clear points. the tag you placed is without evidence , and stop calling others vandals, or i may have to ping admins. ~~

Some important points

[edit]
1) Most important your point is right or wrong, as earlier said just do not revert in a content dispute. By mistake some one makes a revert third time in a single day simply gets blocked. Revert block is biggest trap on WP which helps opponent in content disputes, don't have revert temptation even by mistake.
2) Next very important point is do not personalize. Don't refer some one as 'Muslim editor' or some thing. What proof are there some one is of any specific background or not. As much as possible one needs to retain good faith. One ends up spending lot of time in resolving personalized disputes and usually loosing more than gaining more. Simply remove/avoid personalizing comments.
3) In content dispute resolution Third opinion, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and Request for comment are the steps available. What is decided at Request for comment is usually considered final. Best thing don't get in disputes at least till you have studied a dozen dispute resolutions of others otherwise you end up exhausted like nothing. Save your energies we have lot more to do at Wikipedia.

I have few other articles to suggest but I will let you know that in separate section.

Happy editing

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Bookku thanks for the guidance, i will keep these points in mind Atheist kerala (talk)

Persecution section and article

[edit]
  • Usually in encyclopedic articles we are supposed to prefer paragraph writing over list and we do have some good sources to do paragraph writing for persecution section and I/ we will do it some time after second week of Feb.
  • The last but not least is we are not supposed to copy paste any content from other website or news portal as is but supposed to write in our own words other wise content is removed as copyright violation and repeat copyright violation can lead to blocking accounts.
Simplest way I do is I take content to be rewritten on my personal computer, use google dictionary by saying 'Define xyz' it gives synonyms for words first try to use alternate verb if not possible then change other words.

Wish you happy editing

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jamitha Teacher

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Atheist kerala. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jamitha Teacher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jamitha Teacher

[edit]

Hello, Atheist kerala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jamitha Teacher".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:MappilaKhrais per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afv12e. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- Amanda (she/her) 03:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atheist_kerala&oldid=1237090464"