User talk:BUjjsp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BUjjsp, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi BUjjsp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


はいさい, BUjjsp! I've noticed that you've contributed to the subject of Ryūkyū. I invite you to join WikiProject Ryūkyū, AKA the Ryukyu task force, a collaborative effort to expand and deepen coverage of subjects pertaining to Ryūkyūan geography, history, and culture. Here are a few links to pages to start you off:

I hope you'll take interest and decide to be a part of this project. めんそーれ! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 06:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "goryeo". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 1 January 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected[edit]

The request for formal mediation concerning goryeo, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 02:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, BUjjsp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

"Neither source mentions virility nor that dog meat consumption is a characteristic of the culture as a whole?"[edit]

You sure?

"Many older Koreans believe dog meat aids virility"

"Koreans have been eating dog for thousands of years"

[1] Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Ah, I only saw the sources listed at the end of the sentence, neither of which mentioned virility. Thanks for pointing that out. BUjjsp (talk) 17:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
However, the fact that "many older Koreans believe dog meat aids virility" does not mean that this represents the culture as a whole, which is how the the current passage seems to portray it.BUjjsp (talk) 17:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

UC Berkeley[edit]

I'm glad you went to Berkeley. Seems like a cool place. It may surprise you to know that not everyone in the English-speaking world understands what "UC Berkeley" means and making them go through the extra effort of clicking a redirect instead of just using the actual name of the article and the university is unhelpful to a casual reader, especially those not from the United States and attuned to the world of elite public universities. Also, every single page on this website has always displayed education from the first university attended, especially if a transfer process occurred (such as with Barack Obama and Ruth Bader Ginsburg), making their paths to the degrees clearer. CVs are a very particular thing, but, almost entirely, infobox information for a field and for a section starts first to last and there is literally no reason to make the education field the sole outlier. 2601:249:8200:73DB:FCAB:162D:B7ED:281 (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Also, cherrypicking the world "concise" out of Help:Infobox as justification for "UC Berkeley" doesn't hold the most water. 2601:249:8200:73DB:FCAB:162D:B7ED:281 (talk) 15:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

My mistake, I didn't see your response until now. Thanks for addressing your concerns regarding chronological order in the infobox. Given that, I think your edits pertaining to the ordering of institutions make sense. However, in regards to abbreviating the name of the university, not quite sure why that would be confusing. Plenty of articles abbreviate the names of institutions attended, such as Emmanuel Macron which abbreviates École nationale d'administration to "ÉNA" and Donald Trump, which shortens Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania to "The Wharton School". I think part of why these pages have their institutions abbreviated/shortened is for stylistic reasons (not wanting the name of the school to exceed one line in the infobox), which just makes the infobox look cleaner and more user-friendly (e.g. not confusing the reader visually by have "University of California" on one line, and "Berkeley" on another, which can seem like two separate universities to those unfamiliar with American higher education). Anyway, not gonna duke this out if you seem insistent on keeping the entire name of the university, but just wanted to make my rationale clear. BUjjsp (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  1. ^