User talk:Bear030702

Welcome!

Hello, Bear030702, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Hillary Clinton. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 01:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you introduce jokes into articles. Sro23 (talk) 01:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bear030702 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not trying to make any derogatory or otherwise insulting comments on anyone's page, I was just trying to add some true but funny inferences into their pages. I understand that Wikipedia doesn't appreciate that and I have learned my lesson and will try to make serious contributions to pages from now on. Thank you so much. Bear030702 (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Taking a look through your contribution history, none of your contributions have been particularly appropriate. You've engaged in deliberate vandalism. The block was appropriate and I don't believe you have the maturity at this time to edit Wikipedia. I'm not saying you can't ever come back, but I think if we unblocked you now, we'd see the same general sorts of edits you've made up to this point. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bear030702 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the point you are trying to make about how my actions were in violation of Wikipedia's policy and were vandalism. I respect your decision, but I would also like to apologize and sincerely ask for another chance. In fact, I am doing a school research paper on whether or not Wikipedia is a safe source to use for research, and I believe that I can use this recent experience to show how quickly Wikipedia jumps to the action against uncredulous materials added to their pages. I promise that if you reinstate me I will use Wikipedia for its designed purpose and that is to bring knowledge to the world in an easily accessible manner. I think that you can tell from the substantial effort I am putting towards this request that I want to change and use it for its intended purpose. I don't know what else to say to convince you that I have changed, but I have and I give you my word that from now on my edits will contribute to and be worthy or praise from the Wikipedia community. Maybe you can make my ban a period of time instead of indefinite. Thank you for taking the time to look over my request again. Sincerely Bear030702.Bear030702 (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Firstly, Wikipedia is not a safe source for research. Secondly, "I vandalized it for of a school project" is still vandalism. It's also not a novel excuse. The standard offer may be a way forward. Huon (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bear030702 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20044 was submitted on Dec 13, 2017 20:37:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bear030702 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Standard Offer; I am coming back and want to claim the standard offer ban removal. As I have previously stated I have changed and will make contributive edits in the future. Please unblock me so that I can contribute to the good instead of the bad of Wikipedia. Thanks so much. Bear030702 (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reply in over a week SQL ^{Query me!} 20:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you make a convincing argument for me to bring this up at WP:AN? SQL ^{Query me!} 05:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]