User talk:Bigshrimpin

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Seostrategists, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Latitude Group, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Joel.Miles925 (talk) 14:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London & Country Mortgages has been accepted[edit]

London & Country Mortgages, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Daniel kenneth (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Sanderson (company) (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There has to be something that isn't just "business as usual" and sources should be independent - not customers or partners.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Sanderson (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Seostrategists, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 00:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Username and Paid Editing[edit]

In case you are being paid to produce Wikipedia articles (as an SEO strategist), you should carefully read the guidelines for COI and WP:Paid-contribution disclosure (which is a foundation policy). The information below should give you what you need.

Also, your username is probably in violation of the wp:Username policy because it appears to represent a company, not an individual. Usernames that are company names are considered promotional. Follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Changing_username, in particular see the fourth point under "Alternatives to consider." LaMona (talk) 00:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seostrategists. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 00:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Latitude Group, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This also applies to your edits to London & Country Mortgages, Draft:Thomas Sanderson (company) and related articles. I'm making this a final and immediate warning. Your behaviour as an obvious but undeclared paid editor, your user name which is the name of a company which offers a package of 800 backlinks on Wikipedia for £19.99 (seo-strategist.com) means that you are not only in violation of our user name policy, but in violation of our terms of use. Voceditenore (talk) 10:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Voceditenore. I've now changed my username so it sits within the rules of the username policy. I have no affiliation whatsoever with that website, though I can absolutely understand why you would think I would based on my old username. No one is paying me to make these edits, and I'll ensure going forwards that I keep within the guidelines on soapboxing, promotion & advertising. Thanks for taking the time to review.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Willow & Hall Logo.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Willow & Hall Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Your addition to Draft:Willow & Hall has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Thomas Sanderson (company) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Sanderson (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Sanderson (company)[edit]

Hello, Bigshrimpin. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Thomas Sanderson".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 13:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]