Jump to content

User talk:Boxofficeeditorindia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Boxofficeeditorindia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

February 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm Download. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Jilla because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. -download ׀ talk 04:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliably published sources are required

[edit]

Hello, much of the information you have been inserting is not supported by reliably published sources with a reputation for fact checking and editorial board oversight. Please use only appropriate sources and not just something from the web somewhere. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of top 10 indian actors with best fan following has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reproduces the results of a single survey by a medium that doesn't even have a Wikipedia entry. I don't see this meeting WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of highest-grossing Tamil films may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | [[Sun Pictures

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 27 March

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to List of highest-grossing Tamil films does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 07:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from List of highest-grossing Tamil films. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 07:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of highest-grossing Tamil films has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 07:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of highest-grossing Tamil films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. KJ «Click Here» 13:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Arrambam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 13:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:20, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]