For instance, Karsh says:
- "there is an overwhelming and incontrovertible body of contemporary evidence - intelligence briefs, captured Arab documents, press reports, personal testimonies and memoirs, and so on and so forth."
Your text says:
- "He says there is an overwhelming and incontrovertible body of evidence to back this up, including intelligence briefs, captured Arab documents, press reports, personal testimonies and memoirs."
If you're going to use someone else's words, you need to put them in quotation marks to indicate that it is a quote. Alternatively, you can rephrase what the original author said. I'd recommend reading Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing for more detailed guidance.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hadid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.
- As an addendum, if you wish to file a request at AE concerning IRISZOOM, please do so once this block has expired. As long as you provide evidence for your claims, I will defend you as I have him, and I will block anybody who seeks to cast aspersions on you, and of course, if your complaint has merit, I will sanction IRISZOOM. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Blocked as a sockpuppet
|This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Gilabrand that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text