User talk:Caelon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, Caelon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 02:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

License tagging for File:Joey cramer.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Joey cramer.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Pope John Paul I[edit]

Hello Caelon, I just wanted to drop you a note regarding your edit to the Pope John Paul I article. The changes you made to the article were not written in a neutral point of view. The use of "momentous" in the article is an opinion and someone could argue against it. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, all information should be based on facts, written in a neutral point of view, and verifiable in reliable third party sources. If opinions are used in an article, it must be very clear who holds that particular opinion. Best, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011[edit]

Please do not continue to remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Buckfast Abbey. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. If you think that the information you removed should not be in the article, raise the issue on the article's talk page. In addition, changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers) without explanation in the edit summary may be confused with vandalism, so those changes have been reverted too. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  10:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Druid[edit]

I see that you changed the era style there - without explaining what you were doing, although you know about edit summaries. Please don't change era styles without gaining consensus on the talk page of an article. Wikipedia is neutral over era styles and to change them, as I said, you need consensus. WP:ERA will give you more details. Dougweller (talk) 16:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Duncan (actor) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article4943149.ece 50 years of Blue Peter]</ref> the BBC refuted that he was ever a porn star.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Caelon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)