User talk:Candlebox Spacehog

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Candlebox Spacehog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of signature songs have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Bennv3771 (talk) 03:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2018 MTV Movie & TV Awards ‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 01:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same on 2018 Kids' Choice Awards. Even if the list was completely true, our articles aren't a space to place the entire ceremony and who you think are the guests for the show. Nate • (chatter) 02:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Crossing (TV series). Shellwood (talk) 02:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Huntington High School (West Virginia) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, List of one-hit wonders in the United States, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 18:19, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that— Preceding unsigned comment added by Candlebox Spacehog (talk • contribs) April 7, 2018 (UTC)

Industrial Brothers moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Industrial Brothers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sugar, We're Goin Down, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Letting the Cables Sleep, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 20:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are evading the 1 year block on your IP with this account and have also created the Confirmed sock Top Wing82829.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, tracked down the master account.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Candlebox Spacehog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I have a second chance on editing please! Candlebox Spacehog (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to make your unblock requests from your main account, Craigmiller123. Then as a starting point you need to list all your socks and provide a convincing assurance that you will stop socking. Just Chilling (talk) 00:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fashion Ally (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fashion Ally and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fashion Ally, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Candlebox Spacehog! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fashion Ally concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fashion Ally, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]