User talk:Carabidave
Carabidave, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Carabidave! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC) |
The article Mecodema tenaki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No explanation of topic. No context whatsoever.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Mecodema ponaiti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No explanation of topic. No context whatsoever.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Mecodema kokoromatua has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No explanation of topic. No context whatsoever.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Mecodema haunoho
The article Mecodema haunoho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No explanation of topic. No context whatsoever.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Your articles[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, most of your articles provide no context whatsoever. You need to provide context so that readers know what they are reading about. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- You now seem to have gone to the opposite extreme, creating articles which are entirely adornment and no text. There is a middle ground which doesn't rely on having other people clean up after you.
- I'll move your recent creations to draft where you can work on them until they're ready for publication. Cabayi (talk) 08:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
New Mecodema species[edit]
Hi Dave,
It looks like Stephen Thorpe is being his usual unconstructive self, and just took out all the species names you added to the Mecodema list. While he's right in that the reference for all of them is not yet published, you know it's coming out and so do I and I'm not sure what harm there would be in letting the list stand for now. But, he's playing by the rules. My advice would be to hold off for now, or keep a draft in your sandbox, and when the paper is published we can go through and improve the article together. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mike,
I can understand that he took out the new species, but he also removed the valid species (and subspecies) that are the result of publications unlike Mecodema puiakium, which I dont recognise as a valid species. As usual with Stephen, he only recognises himself as an authority and therefore I will keep readding the valid species. He has been contacting me via iNaturalist regarding the publication.
—carabidave
Your draft article, Draft:Neocicindela helmsi[edit]
Hello, Carabidave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neocicindela helmsi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Neocicindela parryi[edit]
Hello, Carabidave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neocicindela parryi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Neocicindela brevilunata[edit]
Hello, Carabidave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neocicindela brevilunata".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Beetles described by Broun[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Beetles described by Broun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
About Orthoglymma[edit]
Hi Carabidave,
I hope you don't mind me barging in and making all those changes on that article, but its initial version might have been tagged for speedy deletion, as it didn't actually indicate what it was about.
It would appear that the genus Orthoglymma is a monotypic taxon, and its only described species is O. wangapeka. (I guess the species epithet relates to the NZ locality Wangapeka, for which there is only one existing en.wp article - Wangapeka River.)
There's an article name guideline about critters like this: WP:MONOTYPICTAXA.
Hope this helps. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)