User talk:Casaforra

Image:TrofeuNadal-06.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:TrofeuNadal-06.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —P ilotguy (ptt) 21:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article

Hello! I'd like to thank you for contributing to wikipedia, and complement you on a good looking page! I did want to make a few constructive criticisms, however:

Article doesn't cite sources. This is an easy problem to solve, although it might be hard to find english pages on this. Just check the guides on referencing, and it should be pretty easy to find some sources you can use.
Pictures are always nice. While they're of course not a requirement, when used in moderation, they make pages look better. If you have a digital camera, you could easily take a picture of people playing, upload it under public license, and use that for the page's main picture.
External Links: sort of fall into the same category as references. Again, probably can find this with a quick google search.

Well, that's about all I have to say. I checked your user page and saw that you marked yourself as having a basic level of english. If this article was written all by you, i'd say that's at least a notch or two too low! But, if you need want any help with it, leave a note on my talk page, and i'll be happy to do some proofreading when I get around to it (Probably 10-12hrs from the time on this message, as i'm starting to get dizzy from lack of sleep...) Nice job again on the page! -- feb^talk 10:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i've noticed that as a problem with non-native english speakers. Usually, the english they're taught is more 'stuffy' than day-to-day english, although that's not as notable on wikipedia. As far as the accent over the 'o', what I usually do in that case is make an article with standard english letters, and set it to redirect, as I've just done with Valencian fronto. The article should be with the correct spelling, but also easy to access. I'll clean up Valencian fronto for now, Could you make me a list of other articles you've made so I can clean those up too? Thanks! -- feb^talk 17:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thanks for making the pages nice and orderly too. From what I picked up in editing fronto, it sounds kinda like racquetball here in the states, though i've never played it. -- feb^talk 18:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice27

Maurice27 (talk · contribs) has been blocked for 48 hours for violating Wikipedia's No Personal Attacks (NPA) policy. Please do not decsend to his/her level in replying to his/her edits... Physchim62 (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "referee" Mountolive

He is not connected 24 hours, you know? he is busy in real life and also quite busy discussing in the talk page of Valencia (autonomous community) while other editors fan el que volen in the article without looking for consensus as I'm trying to. He is also busy translating articles and doesn't have time to revert the blaverist edits which he is sure you or any other use would revert, because that is all some editors do, just revert blaverist edits. I have nothing against you, but just per favor no em toques els collons massa, ok? Mountolive | Talk 21:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you did a great job with the pilota article. Mountolive | Talk 22:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to play the role of a referee, then you could at least try to look non-partial. In this case, if Maurice27 is pushing to the limit with his uncivil comments you could warn him instead of scolding me for replying him politely.

Good faith, I'll believe you revert non-scientifical vandalisms wherever it comes from, too.

per favor no em toques els collons massa. Is that a threat? I don't think I deserve it, just watch my comments (very civil), and my edits (very neutral).

Thx for yor congrats regarding my job at the Valencian pilota articles. Have you noticed I'm not into flag wars? I prefer to explain in my bad English the few things I know than wasting my time with stupid wars. Try to find any clue for my political ideas in any of my articles and I'll clean up them.

Pilota is a Valencian sport, no matter what language players talk or what their political ideas are. I could name Álvaro Navarro Serra as Àlvar, but he regards himself as Álvaro, so who am I to contradict him?

Be fair, my friend. --Casaforra (parlem-ne) 10:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who said taht I want "to play the role of a referee"? I just want to reach consensus and I'm hoping that we all enter this mood, because actually it is possible if we all abandon the maximalist proposals. I don't want to start a debate about this, but, Casaforra, you know that "politely" doesn't exactly define your reply to Maurice...

I don't know why I am doing this because I am free to do what I want (as you are free not to translate articles yourself) but I just reverted one of those blaverists edits in the Kingdom of Valencia article. As for the Comunitat Valenciana article, I know there are many candidates to do this kind of reverts so you guys don't need me that much, right? ;)

Per favor no em toques els collons massa is a request. A request to, for example, not make edits summaries like "where is referee Mountolive" or similar. On the other side, I can't imagine how someone would feel threatened in wikipedia. At least that would not be my case.

What you're saying about pilota being sportive no matter political considerations is the perfect example of what we should do in the rest of the articles. Again, congrats for that interesting contribution. Mountolive | Talk 07:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I was just looking at the above post and looks like things are quite better these days ;)

Anyway, the motive of this post is that I am trying to upload the covers of the Radio Futura records in this article but I just find the whole thing quite confusing. I opened an account in commons and I uploaded these covers only to be warned some minutes after that "copyright bla bla". I said that they are only record covers, which means that they are eminently public, but they said that no way, that most record covers are subjected to copyright...so am I supposed to swallow that B.S. when I see all the other bands articles displaying the covers of their records?...

I don't know if the problem is that I am supposed to make a picture myself of the record cover and then upload it, instead of copying the cover from any other website. But, in any case I don't have these records here with me.

Now, do you know if there is a way to "smuggle" these covers without meeting "the copyright police"? I understand that there are copyright policies but in this particular case looks to me like non sense to claim that these covers are protected by copyright.

I see here above that you have had similar experiences, so I am just wondering if you have any suggestion.

Thanks! Mountolive | Talk 00:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pelota Players

Hola.

Sorry I haven't written you sooner, but I haven't visited the Wikipedia for some time. No problem with the change on the Julián Retegi page, and thanks a lot for being interested in it. I will try to write new Basque pelotaris pages, but it will be a slow work, since I don't have much time to visit the Wikipedia with my current situation, and it takes my a lot of time to write a simple phrase in English. However, I will try to do it, but I don't promise anything, sorry.

Adeu. Likirman 12:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About to be reported

After editing the Balearic Islands and after reading quite some times the statute of autonomy of the balears (where it says that the catalan Illes Balears is to be used, something I'm obeying each and every time), you are reverting me. So, If after proving you the facts in the talk page for the correctness of my edits(see: [[1]] and [[2]]) you keep reverting, you will be reported for allegedly vandalizing WP:VAN. --Maurice27 21:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation

Should the header to the infobox contain the Spanish name of the region as well as the Valencian/Catalan name?
Should the lead section contain the comment: "Valencian (as Catalan is known in this territory)"?
Should the the proportions of the Valencian flag used in this article be 1:2 or 2:3?

If you feel that there are other issues which require mediation, you may add them in the "Additional issues to be mediated" section.

If you agree to formal, non-binding mediation on these issues, please sign on the RfM page. I hope that you will agree, as mediation will be impossible without your help.

Best wishes, Physchim62 (talk) 15:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comunidad Valenciana hauria d'aparèixer en el cap de l'infobox de la mateixa manera que Comunitat Valenciana?
El commentari ""Valencian (as Catalan is known in this territory)" hauria d'aparèixer en la primera secció?
Les proporcions de la Senyera valenciana serien 1:2 o 2:3?

Si volguessis discutir altres assumptes sobre l'article, les pots afegir en la secció "Additional issues to be mediated" de la pàgina de RfM.

Si acceptes aquesta mediació formal i no-constrenyedora, et prego de firmar a la pàgina de RfM. Espero que accepteràs perquè la mediació no serà possible sense la teva ajuda.

Disculpe'm pel meu català! Physchim62 (talk) 15:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Valencia (autonomous community).

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 16:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Indi07w1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Indi07w1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration

A request for arbitration has been filed concerning the articles Catalonia and Valencian Community. You may, if you wish, make a statement as to whether this request should be accepted or not, although the final decision rests with the Arbitration Committee. Physchim62 (talk) 16:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The more discussion you add to the "Request for arbitration", worst for you, better for us...

As I always tell you, ¡¡¡READ!!! hehehehehe. you are adding more and more discussion in a page where it clearly states:"This is not a page for discussion. Arbitrators or Clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment. Please do not open cases; only an Arbitrator or Clerk may do so."

But you keep on doing it... Hehehehehehe... Thanks! --Maurice27 18:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yes, I edited a reply (1 more time). But you should also warn Physchim62 (who edited 4 more times), Boynamedsue (3 more times), Mountolive (2 more times) and, finally, yourself, who edited 2 more times!

What disturbed you, Maurice27? Are you annoyed that I described your uncivility with some random examples?

"* Andorra, Antoni Gaudí or Northern Catalonia: Diarrhea talk pages plenty of trollings (by you) and insults (by you) with your lack of sense to reach any consensus that doesn't fit your POV.

* And compare them with the way two different POVed users (Mountolive and me) resolve differences: Valencian Nationalist Bloc or Valencian pilota.

I could name many more examples where your posts begin a war-edit because of your bad behaviour.

We all have proved that we can debate with different sources, arguments and reasonings, you haven't. You only disrupt by lying (I never [3] edited in the Catalonia article as you claim [4]), crying aloud [5], laughing at others [6] , trolling [7] or insulting [8]. It's you who, in last term, is causing all this."

Naah! Don't worry! I don't use to feed trolls! :D

Oops! I qualified you as a troll!!

Is that an insult? No way!

You've been previously blocked for trolling [9]. (Just one more of your previous blocks [10])

So, Maurice27, refrain yourself from trying to teach me anything, thanks.

--Casaforra (parlem-ne) 19:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tú mismo, machote... --Maurice27 19:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial matters for the Request for arbitration

I have created a page where we can all expose our controversial matters in each of the articles filled in the request for arbitration. You are invited to contribute in it in order to explain our POVs to the comittee in a clear way. --Maurice27 13:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (Talk) 23:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pilota

Hi Cas. I've been looking at the Valencian pilota article and have done a bit of a rewrite. There were a few phrases that were a bit off, so I fixed them, nothing factual has been changed.

One question though, when you say "modality", do you mean a variety always played in one place (in that case I would use the words "variety", "version" and "variant") or a set of rules that are agreed on and played in different places (in which case it could be signalled as such in the article, and referred to as "the BENICASIM code" or "ALICANTE rules": code=countable, rules=uncountable)?

cheers BNSBoynamedsue 15:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! :)

You know that's something I won't discuss. ;-)

The native speaker of English it's you, not me, so if you tell me "modality" is miss-used I'll trust you, of course. Actually, I said "modality" as I do in Spanish "Modalidad", so I guess your first choice is better: variety, version, variant.

Eventually, you'll notice that throughout my articles I tend to use the words "modality" and "variant" alternatively. I did so in order not to repeat the same term. But gimme a break and in a few days I'll proofread all the articles regarding Valencian pilota and I'll replace "modality" for "variant".

What about "variety"? Such a sentence as "Gaelic football is a variety of football" would be right?

(I looked at that article and it begins with "G.f. is a form of football...")

Anyway, thx for proofreading the new section about pilota's history. If you happen to read any other of the articles I write, feel free to correct them, please. I have no problem at all with property, as I already thanked Mountolive and L to do that.

--Casaforra (parlem-ne) 18:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PD: By the way, how would you translate into Spanish or Catalan your sentence "Have a look for facts" [11]? As I understand it it looks like I misleaded any fact, but your edition is only regarding grammar... :-/

Hi again, we should avoid modality, it's not really used in this context, more in Science.

Variant, Version, Form, Variety all ok. I would initially say "form of the game", then use the rest as synonyms, without "of the game".

I would translate it as "echa un vistazo pa asegurar que yo no haya cambiado alguna informacion sin darme cuenta", but I've just looked again and I can't see where that might have happened

Boynamedsue 08:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, perfect then. I was just a bit sensitive. ;-)

The problem with the "History" section is that it's very poor and not properly explained. There are so many unknown facts for political, social and linguistical reasons we all know, so it's difficult to write a proper article, also my English is not good enough to translate some Catalan slang. That's why I don't dare to translate the ca:Història de la pilota valenciana article. which is otherwise very improvable.

Anyway, I added a link to the main article, Valencian pilota, a PDF in English about history [12] from the Valencian Pilota Federation webpage [13]. Not so much encyclopedical, by the way. :-P

--Casaforra (parlem-ne) 10:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia closed

The above arbitration case has closed. Maurice27 is banned for 30 days, and the parties to the underlying content disputes are encouraged to continue with the normal consensus-building process to produce high-quality articles. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 02:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Indi07w2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Indi07w2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:53, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Indi07w3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Indi07w3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You have recently been engaged in an edit war at Catalan Countries. While you haven't technically violated the three-revert rule, please note that editors who repeatedly revert may be blocked, even if they don't technically exceed three reverts in 24 hours. Pursue dispute resolution if necessary. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 04:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked without reason nor warning by Physchim62

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Casaforra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Admin Physchim62 has blocked me for edit warring. I disagree this since I was reverting 4 times in 3 times a known disruptive editor, Maurice27, who actually DID 4RR in 1 day. Physchim62 hasn't blocked Maurice27, of course, since he agrees with his POV and behaviour, as was noticed in the recent Request for Arbitration about Catalonia which resulted in Maurice27's blocking while proving Physchim62's lenience about him. I stand that this Admin is not fair and has open cases against me. --Casaforra (parlem-ne) 09:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sorry, but reverting someone over content, even a disruptive POVer, doesn't make edit warring right. The block stands. — Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces. 09:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maurice27's case was dealt with by another admin, LaraLove (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) who also participates in informal admin coaching. He was blocked for one week by this admin, then unblocked after discussion with other administrators (I didn't take part in that discussion as I was teaching at the time, but I have seen the record of it). Your edit warring is more serious than that of Maurice, as you were removing the maintenance template which Maurice was trying to place on the article, hence restricting the possibility of discussion. You have been told by ArbCom to play by the rules when editing Catalonia related articles, you have seen what happens if you don't. Physchim62 (talk) 11:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it mean that Maurice27 doesn't have to play by the rules when editing Catalonia related articles? 4RR in less than 1 day and he's forgiven! I do 2RR in 1 day and you block me! Very nice! Very fair!

By the way, I thought, consensus was one of the rules of Wikipedia. Now tell me how you manage this sentence from Maurice27:

"I would like you to post or link here WHERE does it say that I must reach a consensus with you in order to keep the tag. If you fail to give it to me, the tag remains! I'm not here to lose my time with incongruent discussions with someone like you." [14].

Maurice27 didn't propose neither discussed previously to put that Globalize tag on the Països Catalans article, he just put it, and now he reverts and insults the other editors who disagree him.

My point is: Without consensus, that tag is not proper.

Even more: No discussion before adding the tag, no discussion to remove it.

It's up to you, Admins, to decide who you are letting edit on Wikipedia, and I see Physchim62 prefers a disruptive editor as Maurice27.

--Casaforra (parlem-ne) 15:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You did four reverts in less than two days, that counts as edit warring to me, especially given your previous record. I have already explained why I didn't act against Maurice27, and an uninvolved administrator has refused your unblock request. We do not want disruptive contributors, whatever their political colours. Remember that. Physchim62 (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Memorandum of understanding

Hi, I invite you to read this and participate if willing. Cheers, --Maurice27 21:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

Hello Casaforra, would you please let me know if there are any pilota games in the weekend July 6-7? A Frisia Pelota player is visiting Valencia and would like to visit a match. Please contact me via my website www.muurkaatsen.nl —Preceding unsigned comment added by B. (talk • contribs) 13:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surveys at Talk:Valencian Community

Hi! I'm addressing you because you had participated in some way at Valencian Community article. I've started several surveys regarding to naming conventions about the Catalan language, the Spanish language, and about the name of the country of Valencia. I think there's no a real consensus about that and (also because of it) it may help to stop endless polemic disputes. --Joanot Martorell ✉ 17:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Casaforra! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 687 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Pasqual Sanchis Moscardó - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vicente Grau Juan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
José Jorge Mezquita García - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jaume Morales Moltó - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Álvaro Navarro Serra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
José María Sarasol - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Waldo Vila Gilabert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bancaixa0607.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bancaixa0607.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jaume Morales Moltó

The article Jaume Morales Moltó has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, August 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waldo Vila Gilabert

The article Waldo Vila Gilabert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any RS for this bio, belive that it fails the WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Valnetjugadors.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Valnetjugadors.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Players of Basque pelota

Category:Players of Basque pelota, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 21:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José Vicente Riera Calatayud

The article José Vicente Riera Calatayud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources found,not notable, content cannot be verified

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 17:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ValNet

The article ValNet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In the twelve years since this article was created, no (non-primary) reliable sources have been proffered, and there is no evidence of the subject's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Handball International Championships, 2007

The article Handball International Championships, 2007 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possibly fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]