User talk:Casule

Casule, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Casule! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Scottie Pippen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Scottie Pippen was changed by Casule (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854308 on 2015-04-10T06:26:20+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Iknow23. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Drake discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Hotline Bling doesn't show any RIAA cert at http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=%22Drake%22 Iknow23 (talk) 06:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vesna Petrusevska (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vesna Petrusevska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vesna Petrusevska (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Still needs any further available amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vesna Petrusevska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NBA infobox

I removed your recent changes to the infobox of LeBron James. You many not have been aware, but WP:NBASTYLE is generally followed. The list of highlights is not meant to be exhaustive. In the past, there has not been a consensus to include the citizenship award, and All-Rookie is omitted since he was Rookie of the Year and his list is already long. Let me know if you have any concerns. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vesna Petrusevska concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vesna Petrusevska, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vesna Petrusevska

Hello, Casule. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vesna Petrusevska".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 03:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]