User talk:Cfcox

Welcome!

Hello, Cfcox, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:"The Concise Expression Handbook" (2020), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Passenger pigeon (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:"The Concise Expression Handbook" (2020)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:"The Concise Expression Handbook" (2020), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Passenger pigeon (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Concision. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reduplicatives (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reduplicatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfcox! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my reply to the other manager. Thanks, Cfcox. Cfcox (talk) 16:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia already has an article about reduplicatives at reduplication, with reduplicative redirecting there. No need for an additional article about it. --Belbury (talk) 15:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying.

As far as I can tell, reduplication and reduplicatives are substantially different things. Cfcox (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft you've written seems about the same as Reduplication#English to me. By all means contribute to the existing article if there's a closely related concept that's missing there, though. --Belbury (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That might be the correct next step. Cfcox (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reduplicatives

Hello, Cfcox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reduplicatives, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reduplicatives

Hello, Cfcox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reduplicatives".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]