Jump to content

User talk:Chesivoirzr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Chesivoirzr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Domain-specific learning may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''Domain-specific learning''' theories of [[developmental psychology hold that we have many independent, specialized knowledge structures,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fowler's stages of faith development may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • a [[developmental stage]] of [[faith]] (or [[spiritual]] development) across the |life span]]. It is closely related to the work of [[Jean Piaget]], [[Erik Erikson]], and [[Lawrence Kohlberg]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Distancing (psychology) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Co-sleeping. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Co-sleeping was changed by Chesivoirzr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921985 on 2014-10-02T00:38:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Parenting styles with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 01:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Addictive personality has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agreeableness. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Agreeableness was changed by Chesivoirzr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959325 on 2014-10-08T02:45:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Psychology of religion, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Psychology of religion was changed by Chesivoirzr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946179 on 2014-10-08T03:00:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eccentricity (behavior) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loevinger's stages of ego development. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Erikson's stages of psychosocial development, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Erikson's stages of psychosocial development was changed by Chesivoirzr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905909 on 2014-10-13T03:47:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

[edit]

Hello, Chesivoirzr. I've started a thread concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; a WP:Permalink for that thread is here. Flyer22 (talk) 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WIkipedia and talking

[edit]

Hi Chesivoirzr. I saw the discussion of your editing at the administrators notice board and reviewed your edits and this page. You are not off to a good start here! First and most important thing -- the thing that makes Wikipedia work is that editors talk to each other. You don't seem to be aware that this is possible, or perhaps you are not aware it is necessary. It is! Every article has a Talk page, and this is your Talk page, where people can talk with you and you can talk back. If you need help with this process of talking, and with understanding why your edits are being rejected, please ask.

I also have to tell you that because discussion is so fundamental to everything we do here, editors who just refuse to discuss things and keep making edits that are rejected, get blocked or banned. So you do need to engage in discussion, if you want to retain your editing privileges (they are a privilege - one that is freely offered to all - and they can be revoked). Good luck! Jytdog (talk) 10:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apology for my Disruptive Editing!

[edit]

Hello, this is Chesivoirzr, and I apologize for my unintentionally disruptive edits. Thank you very much for bringing the issue to my attention! I am fairly new to Wikipedia and I want to improve as an editor and I don't want to get banned from editing Wikipedia. I'm very sorry for what I have done and I want to improve at editing Wikipedia articles. I want to regain my editing privileges and make excellent contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you very much and have a great day! How could I regain my Wikipedia editing privileges? Last night, I re-examined the Student training seminar to improve my editing. I don't want my editing to be banned! I also apologize for my lack of communication on the Talk Page. Thank you very much! How could I improve at becoming a better editor? How could I avoid the mistakes I made? How could I get help from other editors on Wikipedia? I hope that we could reach a consensus on how I could improve my editing. I want us to resolve the problem in a civil and respectful manner.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesivoirzr (talk • contribs) 12:37, 15 October 2014 ‎(UTC)[reply]

hi chesiviozr - you haven't lost your editing privileges yet - we are just trying to call your attention to the problem so that we don't have to take away your privileges, which is never a happy thing to do We have your attention, which is great. And you now have shown you know how to write on a talk page, which is also great! Please make sure to sign any post you make on a Talk by putting four tildas at the end of your post - when you click "save" it will be converted into a signature by the software that makes wikipedia go. also, please be sure you "thread" comments by putting a colon in front of your comment, like i did here - it creates a "tab" that indents your comment. one colon indents once (makes one tab), two colons makes two tabs, etc. Both those things are important to keeping threads organized.
Bigger picture - take your time, and try to make your edits fit in style-wise with the rest of the content in the article (for instance, encyclopedia articles don't ask questions to readers - textbooks do that - and Wikipedia is not a textbook.
Please do read the links in the welcome message above (I know, it is a lot!) Then go ahead and be bold and make changes, but if you are reverted, go the article's Talk page and ask why -- and really ask, and really listen to the answer, so that you can learn. good luck! Jytdog (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chesivoirzr, and welcome to the English Wikipedia! You are not blocked or banned, and you are welcome to edit.
You can get help at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, which is a specialized place for newer editors. You might also consider looking at the group of people interested in psychology, which is WP:WikiProject Psychology. It's a pretty small group, though, so it might not be very active. They have a talk page at WT:WikiProject Psychology where anyone interested in the subject can leave a note. If you want to reply to someone else's note there, then click the little "Edit" button next to the subject of their message. Then you can add your reply right underneath theirs. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: ChamithN

Reference Errors on 4 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chesivoirzr's Response to Reference Errors on 4 November

[edit]

ReferenceBot, thank you very much for bringing the mistake of my error in referencing to my attention. How could I fix the error I made on the article Nuclear family/ Chesivoirzr (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Chesivoirzr[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chesivoirzr&oldid=647975916"