User talk:ClueBot Commons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.


ClueBots
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script
Crystal Clear action run.png
ClueBot III/Archive · ClueBot VI/WP:CHUU Clerk  · Talk

Cobi/Owner // Talk
Navy binoculars.jpg Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

thanks[edit]

thanks sir for look at Angrej — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakam singh indian (talkcontribs) 15:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Article prefix/namespace bug[edit]

A MediaWiki bug (phabricator:T87645) resulted in a number of articles intended for other namespaces being created within namespace 0 on January 27th 2015. A number of these (listed below) were related to the activities of this account. All have now been superseded by entries in the correct namespace.

I intend to delete the misplaced articles of the next few days. I do not believe this action should interfere with (or even be noticed by) this bot, but please yell if you disagree.

Cheers. - TB (talk) 09:25, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Article Wrong pageid Timestamp Right pageid Timestamp
User:ClueBot_III/Detailed_Indices/!Viva_Nueva! 45227512 20150127093336 18937802 20140827141838
User:ClueBot_III/Detailed_Indices/Talk:HIV/AIDS/Archive_11 45227591 20150127094638 41233475 20131130191057
User:ClueBot_III/Detailed_Indices/User_talk:Jazzeur/archive4 45227515 20150127093451 24440073 20111103181535
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:Antidepressant 45227722 20150127101343 41233500 20150127100250
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:Benito_Mussolini 45227537 20150127093951 36620622 20130415041748
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:Caligula_(film) 45227706 20150127100942 23353137 20090706023548
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:Mircea_Eliade 45227701 20150127100838 28054495 20130918020549
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:Pakistan-administered_Kashmir 45227656 20150127100029 34312487 20130415042853
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:Sokal_affair 45227567 20150127094205 44321929 20141106214130
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Talk:United_States_Constitution 45227543 20150127094042 20655557 20150515120151
User:ClueBot_III/Indices/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Encyclopaedia_Britannica 45227575 20150131170206 45269019 20150201021955
User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:Aqua_regia 45227606 20150127094816 29070331 20150127101759
User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:Benito_Mussolini 45227538 20150127093954 36620623 20130415041750
User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:Caligula_(film) 45227707 20150127100944 23353139 20090706023550
User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:Olbers'_paradox 45227754 20150127102006 44862250 20150427024654
User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:Pakistan-administered_Kashmir 45227657 20150127100032 34312488 20130415042854
User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:Sokal_affair 45227568 20150127094206 44321930 20141106214131
@Topbanana: Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 134#API namespace issue / page reported existing in two namespaces and posts linked from that, incl. User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2015/February#Puzzle and User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2015/February#Indices listed at Special:ShortPages. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the info; I've added a regular check & cleanup for this issue. For now, all the entries of the list above are fixed. - TB (talk) 19:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

How do you delete vandalism so quickly?[edit]

Did Wikipedia give you like a special program or something? Ollypf (talk) 02:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

ClueBot is a bot assigned to revert vandalized articles automatically. -- Dspradau → talk  02:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Who are u? Robb icecream (talk) 10:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please refer to the red box at the top of this page. You can get more information by following the links. Wdchk (talk) 13:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Broken link[edit]

Hi creators of Cluebot, I just wanted to let you know that this link is broken. Hope you guys fix it soon so I can help review the dataset :) Rambunctious Racoon (talk) 11:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

This is still the case as of today. Is the dataset review no longer a thing?Rambunctious Racoon (talk) 07:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
@Cobi: @Rich Smith: @DamianZaremba:--5 albert square (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Why?[edit]

From Mikeman434

In response to the removal of my edit on the Reading Fightin Phills page, I believe that this edit being retracted from the page is a mistake, the LeHigh Valley Iron Pigs website will confirm that KC Serna has joined the team, he is also my older cousins boyfriend. So if you can, can you reinstate my edit? Thank you Mikeman434 (talk) 02:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

@Mikeman434: Please see the information I left on your Talk page. ClueBot is a computer program, and cannot answer your question. General Ization Talk 02:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Are you Vietnamese? Tuyết xanh (talk) 14:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Please read the text in the red box at the top of the page. General Ization Talk 14:36, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion for ClueBot NG[edit]

I've noticed that ClueBot NG has the ability to recognize when a user has been given a certain level of vandalism warnings. For example, if a user has recently received {{uw-vandalism1}} and {{uw-vandalism2}}, and they make an edit that ClueBot NG reverts, the message that the bot leaves is very similar to {{uw-vandalism3}}. However, what I've noticed is that the bot does not recognize that a user has received a level one warning if that warning is {{welcome-unconstructive}} or {{welcome-anon-unconstructive}}. If possible, I would like to see its programming tweaked in a way that it would be able to recognize when a user has received a warning that is mixed in with a welcome message, so that it does not leave a level one warning on the page of such users and leaves the level two warning instead. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

You reverted a BLP PROD blanking.[edit]

I flag this as a false positive. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 02:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Not a false positive. Good revert. --NeilN talk to me 03:27, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
No, it's not. It's reverting PROD BLPs. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Show me where guidelines say we blank prodded articles. --NeilN talk to me 03:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP PROD DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Feel free to look at my contributions to see my good faith in regards to wanting to remove non-notable living rape victims from Wikipedia per WP:BLP. I did accept the rationale of one editor however on the PROD removal and did not revert the PROD. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:36, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Please read what you're linking to. "To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography." --NeilN talk to me 03:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
The policy on BLP in general allows you to delete information. There's no way to know which of these rape victims are alive or dead, especially considering that they were young birth mothers. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

175 sources. As I said, good revert. --NeilN talk to me 03:47, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

If you read the nomination process of WP:BLP PROD, it says:
Make sure the article contains no sources in any form, which support any statements made about the person.
Check the biography's history to be sure that it was created after March 18, 2010.
As @NeilN: has already advised you, there are 175 sources in the article. Also, if you check the article's history, you will see that it was created in 2007. Therefore, the process that you used does not apply to this article and this is a good revert by the bot. I hope this explains everything to you.--5 albert square (talk) 04:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

ClueBot III not archiving again?[edit]

Is anyone else experiencing ClueBot III not archiving their talk page again?--5 albert square (talk) 13:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)