User talk:Colton hockey11

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Tony Almeida, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --MiB-24 (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to 24 (season 8). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --MiB-24 (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is not considered a reliable, verifiable source since anyone can add material to it and it is often wrong. You need to find something from a reliable source such as a newspaper, official press release, or some other source which can be trusted for the edits you keep making relating to 24. --MiB-24 (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please try to read up on what is needed to verify material on Wikipedia. Nothing you've used so far to try and add Carlos Bernard to Season 8 can be verified. A single blog post on a newspaper website and IMDB do not really meet the needed criteria, especially when every other news article and press release do NOT mention Bernard as being in Season 8. You really need to wait until either Fox comes out and says Bernard will be back, or it is confirmed by either Bernard himself or a member of the crew. I know how easy it is to want to add material to Wikipedia due to excitement about an upcoming event, but it needed to be properly sourced in order to be included on Wikipedia. --MiB-24 (talk) 04:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Tucker-McCall-Y&R.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tucker-McCall-Y&R.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope I fixed everything up correctly. --colton_hockey11 22:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tucker McCall

If you look down The Young and the Restless minor characters article, you will see that most of the characters listed there are major characters at one point or another during the series. If anything, the article should be renamed something like The Young and the Restless miscellaneous characters. But regardless, even if Tucker McCall is a main character right now, that does not mean he warrants an entire article based around him. At this encyclopedia, articles need to provide additional information beyond plot to establish notability. There's a bit of a casting section, but there's nothing on the writing or the reception of the character. Nothing that shows why he is notable.

Here are some examples of soap opera character articles that do establish notability: Pauline Fowler, Todd Manning, Dimitri Marick, and Bianca Montgomery. As you can see, each page is filled with information on the characters that include and extend beyond just the fictional storylines they are involved in, such as details on their casting, writing/development, cultural impact, and reliable sources that support all of that information. Those are all the things that would be needed for Tucker McCall and many other characters to warrant their own page. Do you intend to provide this notability? Rocksey (talk) 06:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After waiting for about a week to see if you or anybody would start working on establishing notability for the Tucker McCall article, I just decided to redirect again. Rocksey (talk) 06:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dion Phaneuf.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dion Phaneuf.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dion Phaneuf.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dion Phaneuf.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tucker-McCall-Y&R.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tucker-McCall-Y&R.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 03:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Musicfreak7676 ^{my talk page!} 19:32, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User talk:Musicfreak7676. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Colton hockey11. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 07:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 07:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hope Logan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Musicfreak7676 ^{my talk page!} 01:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious if you even watch Bold and the Beautiful. Hope's marriage to Liam was not legal, therefore they are NOT married. Hope did not sign the wedding papers, and Hope is now living back at the Logan Mansion. Please do not edit my posts when my information is accurate. Colton hockey11 (talk) 04:40, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I do watch it. And it was more than that information, per WP:SOAPS, we do not classify how marriages are at their current state. You saying "Invalid" violates the terms of WP:SOAPS. And if you do watch, then you know they stated it's recognized in Italy and not California, thereby making it a legal marriage by European law. Musicfreak7676 ^{my talk page!} 14:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The marriage is not legal in the state of California because Hope did not sign the wedding papers. Regardless if there was a ceremony in Italy, if the marriage license was not signed, it is NOT a recognized marriage. Therefore the marriage is invalid, and is not an actual marriage.Colton hockey11 (talk) 14:32, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello. You have a new message at Yunshui's talk page. TheSpecialUser ^TSU 15:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/CBS Daytime Soap Operas

Hi there. I see you are a contributor to CBS Daytime related soap operas. Please see the Wikiproject proposal for Y&R and B&B, and I hope you support it! It will be a great place to share and improve things and better articles. —ArreJLover 05:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hi there. here there is a discussion regarding List of The Young and the Restless characters (2010s) and its unmanageable length. Please contribute your opinion asap, thankyou. Ar re 11:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Brian Mulroney

On 2 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Brian Mulroney, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 19:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]