User talk:Comicbook30

Welcome!

Hello, Comicbook30, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Your recent edits

Removal of verifiable information is considered vandalism and your recent edits have been reverted. Please do not continue to remove information from Wikipedia articles. If you wish to experiment, please try the sandbox.IrishLass (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued removal of verified information, the episode count of Las Vegas episodes on the episode list is vandalism. You've removed verifiable content. Do not continue or you will be warned for vandalism. IrishLass (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of references is a violation of policy. Air dates and episode titles of television shows must be verifiable or they may not be added. Futon Critic and other unofficial sites are not reliable and cannot be used as verifiable. IrishLass (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts to List of Las Vegas episodes

Your reverting to a previous version violates policy by removing references. When references appear, removing them violates the verifiability efforts of editors. You may think something is right, but unless you can verify the information without removing past references, you are vandalising the page. You've been warned about these reverts, doing the reverts again after this warning will be considered vandalism. Removing verifiable references is considered vandalism. IrishLass (talk) 14:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not removing references. All you have listed are numbers and TBA with no references to the actual episodes existing other then "we know there is going to be 106 episodes". That's fine, and I have given you verifiable websites (that are BTW not Fansites), with names of the episodes over and over again. I don't think it's vandalism when you add verifiable information and unless you can find somewhere in the rules that show that TheFutonCritic and Zap2It are unreliable sites, I will just keep adding the episodes back. Comicbook30 (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know who "you've explained it to" but your reverts are against two policies WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. The second one says Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and anything that can't be verified or hasn't happened, can't be added to an encyclopedia. When you go and "revert" to your edit, you are removing references in previous episodes that User:Robinepowell removes. Continuing to add unsourced information or information from unreliable sources as deemed by Wikipedia's WP:V policy is considered vandalism. You might want to not add information from unreliable sources. KellyAna (talk) 21:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, just by the sheer fact that "critic" is in the title, Futon Critic becomes an opinion site. For verifiability purposes, critics and opinions are not acceptable. KellyAna (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to The Game (U.S. TV series). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Rules of Engagement episodes

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Rules of Engagement episodes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rules of Engagement episodes. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 07:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading Pictures

{{helpme}} How do I upload a picture for a certain article?

Please see WP:UPLOAD for a quick and easy way. However, please be sure to see WP:IMAGE for some tips on uploading correctly and respecting copyright. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 00:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode count

Hello... please don't update episode counts for television series until a new episode actually airs. Otherwise, we run the risk of predicting that the event definitely will occur when we have no proof of that. Thanks. --Ckatz^chat _spy 01:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to American Broadcasting Company has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Party!^{Talk to me!} 20:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to New Amsterdam (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. jj137 (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Return of Jezebel James constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. jj137 (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

A new reminder of this. You continue to update Damages episode count before single episodes, and now the entire series, air. These edits have been and will continue to be reverted. Drmargi (talk) 03:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Most British people and many people internationally write dates in day-month-year order, e.g., 12 December 1904. Most Americans use month-day-year order, e.g., December 12, 1904. If the article is about an American topic, use month-day-year. If it is a British topic, use day-month-year. If neither, leave it as originally written. Many Americans or British people take offence if an article about their country, written in their local version of English, is changed around to a version they don't use. So please do not do that.

Dates are usually enclosed in two square brackets, as in [[12 December]] or [[December 12]]. This means that you can set your preferences (if you look around your screen you'll see the word preferences; click on it and follow the instructions) to ensure that you see all dates in the format you want, whether date-month-year, month-date-year or yyyy-mm-dd. The general rules on how Wikipedia articles are written can be seen in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Rules specific to dates and numbers can be seen in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers).

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on the web's fastest growing encyclopædia (or encyclopedia, if you write it that way!). Thank you. Xenon⁵⁴ 22:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project Gary

A tag has been placed on Project Gary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 18:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for The Ex List‎. --Finngall ^talk 18:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode count

Please stop updating episode count prior to airing of the episodes. Your edit is both premature and incorrect. Also, taking a look at your talk page indicates that you have been repeatedly asked before to stop your improper and disruptive behavior. Should you continue to pursue this editing pattern, I'd have to ask for some sort of administrative intervention. ^LeaveSleaves 02:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Continuing to act in this manner, particularly after numerous warnings and explanations, can be considered disruptive behaviour. --Ckatz^chat _spy 05:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning regarding this - please do not disregard. It would be best if you could please respond to the concerns expressed by numerous editors over the past year. --Ckatz^chat _spy 01:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The episodes were airing when I fixed the numbers. It was pointless of you to revert the edits despite the fact that I added some information. I changed it about 5 minutes before both Fringe and Scrubs aired and you reverted them, while they were airing. Comicbook30 01:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not only were your edits premature, in the link I've provided above and some other cases, these updated numbers were also incorrect. And there are many other such cases. ^LeaveSleaves 01:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was a few weeks ago. Yesterday my edits were correct and on time. I haven't done anything within the recent week that would give anyone the need tp comment on the page. I have read what you commented on and I have followed it so far. Theres no need for you to comment just because Ckatz made a mistake. I'm not ging to incorrectly update pages. Comicbook30 02:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit history, and the comments on your talk page, paint a different picture. It would help if you could indicate what time zone's feed you are viewing, given that you changed Scrubs at 3:50 PM Pacific time yesterday. That is 6:50 PM Eastern, which is two hours and ten minutes before the series airs on the East Coast. --Ckatz^chat _spy 03:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You continue your spurious edits despite multiple warnings. Stop immediately. ^LeaveSleaves 18:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You continue - despite repeated warnings - to prematurely update episode counts, air dates, and other details of TV series articles. You have had sufficient warnings, and are strongly suspected of continuing this disruptive behaviour as User:Danigro89 and as an IP. If you disrupt Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ckatz^chat _spy 20:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Repeatedly warned about disruptive edits (early updates of episodes etc.); very likely that this account is directly related to User:Danigro89, User:Raldonscale25, User:Resistance10. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Ckatz^chat _spy 23:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked indefinitely for block evasion as IP 24.46.114.125; see also User:Danigro89, User:Raldonscale25, User:Resistance10. --Ckatz^chat _spy 01:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]