User talk:Connor McCormick

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. I wish you a happy New Year --ChocolateRabbit 18:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ChocolateRabbit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 22:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Call of Duty. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ousmane Dembélé, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alastair Seeley

You have made unsourced changes to this article - please take the time to provide a published press-source for his change of team/race class. You have been around Wikipedia long-enough to know that this is required.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 13:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to Alastair Seeley made me think of Stuart Easton, who is about the same size and similar background. This change I wrote will show you how to format and apply a reference - refs can be placed inside the infobox adjacent to the text.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 23:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 Formula One World Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Formula One World Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One World Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. T v x1 13:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi Connor McCormick. It appears that you might be working on inprovements for existing articles or on possible drafts for future articles on your user page. Generally, it would be better for you do do such things on a user subpage or in your user sandbox instead. Your userpage is primarily for letting others know a little bit about yourself (within reason) and your Wikipedia-related activities as explained in WP:UPYES, and user pages which are not in compliance with Wikipedia:User pages can be deleted or blanked accordingly. So, my suggestion to you would be to move this content to either a subpage or a sandbox before someone else removes the content. If you've got any questions about this you can ask them below or you can ask for help at the Wikipedia Teahouse. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Hi Connor McCormick. Non-free content like File:Turkish Euro 2024 bid logo.svg can only be used in articles; it cannot be used on your userpage per WP:NFCC#9 and WP:UP#Non-free files. I've previously removed this file from your user page before, but you just re-added it. Perhaps you didn't notice the edit summary I left when I removed the file the first time, so I'm posting this here for further clarification. Please don't re-add this file or add any other non-free files to your user page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Max Stryjek, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello Connor McCormick,

I have deleted your user page, because you have been using that page for content unrelated to improving the encyclopedia. Please read Wikipedia:User pages and follow that policy. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC) WHY THE F DID YOU GET RID OF MY PAGE[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Cullen328. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Cullen328. You do not properly sign a post, despite having been here nearly a year, a bot does it for you properly, and you revert it and manually insert your name and the time where you live, rather than UTC? That's not helpful. You need to drop it, now. John from Idegon (talk) 18:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, sign your posts. And don't put personal identifying information in public messages. Drmies (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wait--was User:Connor Mc yours too? A second account, with more webhost violations? Drmies (talk) 18:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Cullen328. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cullen328&diff=861025337&oldid=857810100 Sagecandor (talk) 18:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 21:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi Connor McCormick. As I posted above in #Your userpage, there were some issues with your userpage that needed to be addressed so that it was in compliance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. We as editors don't have any ownership over our userpages, and they may be edited at anytime by another editor or even deleted by an administrator if necessary to make sure they are used in accordance with Wikipedia:User pages. I mentioned this could happen if you didn't take any steps yourself to address the problems with the page, but you never responded to my original post. If there was something about it that you didn't understand, then you could've asked for clarification; instead, you kept adding inappropriate content to your userpage as if it was some kind of online diary to post about yourself and anything other than your Wikipedia activities. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for people treat like their own personal webpage, and pages like yours are pretty much regularly deleted by administrators per WP:U5. Moreover, if as you posted here that you were using the page your homework, then you really do (did?) seem to misunderstand the purpose of a userpage. If you would've just clarified this above in response to my first post, then perhaps myself or another editor could've helped you sort this out. Regardless, lashing out like you did against Cullen328 with personal attacks and blanking his userpage was not the right thing to do. If you would've simply asked Cullen to clarify why he deleted your userpage, he would've done so and explained what you needed to do to get that content back. Now that you're blocked, there's not much you can do until either you're unblocked by an administrtor or your block expires in two weeks.

Now, if you would like to know how you can request that your account be unblocked, please take a look at Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more details. Blocks are only intended to prevent an editor from causing any further disruption; so, if you can convince an adminstrator that you understand why you were blocked and have no intention of ever repeating that behavior again, then your account may be unblocked. There are no guarantees though and if you do or post things which lead an administrator to feel that you're refusing to acknowledge your mistake or have no intention of listening to what others are try to tell you, then you might find your block being extended. The Wikipedia community is more that willing to give editors who make mistakes (even a serious mistake) a second chance if it feels that it's to community's benefit to do so and will not be a waste of everyone's time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:57, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: F1 2020 (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JQTriple7 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2018 Formula One World Championship. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F1 2020 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F1 2020, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JQTriple7 ^talk 09:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Connor McCormick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JQTriple7 ^talk 09:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Connor McCormick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23285 was submitted on Nov 17, 2018 14:05:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Connor McCormick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won’t do anymore vandalism and I will only do my page only and please can I have my old Wikipedia page back :) Connor McCormick (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Edits like this make me concerned about your ability to work collaboratively to the benefit of the project. You also appear to have spent the majority of your editing on your (now deleted) userpage. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for you to maintain a personal web presence. As such, I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. I would recommend also including in your next unblock request a note about what articles you intend to contribute to, and what sort of edits you will be making to those articles. stwalkerster (talk) 01:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.