Jump to content

User talk:CrafterNova/Archive/February 2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Current discussion


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Stage Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art Company.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

 Fixed —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 06:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hello, thank you for the welcome package and the support! I really appreciate it! You convinced me that it's worthwhile to make an account, but I had a question. Would my previous edits be retroactively contributed to the new account, or is that just the trade-off for having made edits as an IP? Either way, thank you for the warm welcome! 198.2.93.215 (talk) 19:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

I have asked a question about that here, so hopefully active users will respond. If you need more help from active users such as administrators, then you can add the template {{help me}} to your talk page like this:
== Your issue ==
{{Help me}}
Your question. —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

@CrafterNova: Incredible, thank you! I'm very grateful. I wonder what they'll say 198.2.93.215 (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Very welcome again ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 06:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Also I just saw the edit reversion you did on the one page, regarding criminal activity. Cannot emphasize enough how much I appreciate the support 198.2.93.215 (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

You are very welcome ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 05:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

@CrafterNova: For what it's worth, I promise I was intending to act in good faith. The other person had a point, that source is unreliable. I hadn't realized at the time. I believe I've addressed it now though 198.2.93.215 (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@198.2.93.215: So was I. Initally I assumed that the source was reliable. I have found another source: https://newsrn.com/tech/2020-01-14--rape--suicide-and-underage-exploitation--provisions-that-agitate-french-cinema---walla!--culture.SJnpDTieL.html. Bergeron's case is the 2nd one. What do you think about this one? —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 05:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@CrafterNova: I think it's a good article that speaks to his relevance and public status! I'm not sure how well it will work on backing up the charges themselves, seeing how stringent the requirements seem to be. But I also haven't checked the current status of the talk page yet. Truthfully, it's all a bit stressful. I'll check it now though. Thanks again for the reminder on signing comments! 198.2.93.215 (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Sure. I will be available to discuss and improve the article tomorrow. Thanks and have a great day ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 19:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@CrafterNova: Sounds good! No pressure. I responded on the talk page, check it out when, and only when, you want to. Thanks for being so nice. I hope you have a lovely day! 198.2.93.215 (talk) 20:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Oh, it's my pleasure ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 04:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

@CrafterNova: Hello! It's 198.2.93.215 I went ahead and made an account, and this is it. Nice to meet you (again!) Seven Thousand Spiders In A Trenchcoat (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

@Seven Thousand Spiders In A Trenchcoat: Wow, that's an interesting username . Nice to see you with an account. You are officially a Wikipedian now. ;)
However, I won't be available for discussion about Bibo Bergeron's article because of my college exams. Hope to see you in 2 months ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 15:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Discussion invitation

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bibo Bergeron. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Ester Soré

Hi: I'm not sure why you changed this back to a biography stub.

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types/Culture#Singers This lists all stubs under the people stubs category. It's considered better to have a more precise stub category if it can be used; they are considered biography stubs. Thank you. --FeanorStar7 (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@FeanorStar7: Sorry, I didn't know that stub categories have to be precise, but can you provide a link for where this consensus was achieved? I agree with you now —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 14:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
@User:CrafterNova: thanks. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting for more information. For Ester Soré I'm going to change the stub back if that's alright--FeanorStar7 (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you, have a great day ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 15:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, CrafterNova, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that over the past two or three months you have become a very active editor but that you have not yet created any articles. As you intend to help us with more women's biographies, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. If you have difficulty in choosing someone to write about, you should see if you can find an interesting listing in our Redlist index. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

About your currently-queued IABot job

Hi! I noticed that you've got InternetArchiveBot batch job #9508 queued up. Unfortunately, the way you've formatted the list of target articles (with commas and spaces) won't work, since the bot will treat the whole shebang as one long article title (and fail, since there is no article with that exact name); the article titles in the target list have to be separated by linebreaks in order for IABot to recognize them as separate article titles. Just a heads-up! :-) Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes 23:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Addendum - jobs #9517 and #9528 have the same issue. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes 23:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
@Whoop whoop pull up: I just noticed that yesterday. I will fix and resubmit these lists today. Thank you for the reminder, have a great day ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 03:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CrafterNova/Archive/February_2022&oldid=1136485772"