Jump to content

User talk:Cristintierney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kronschlaeger, Alois by Rainer Hosch.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Kronschlaeger, Alois by Rainer Hosch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alois Kronschlaeger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Alois Kronschlaegernews, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ClayClayClay 09:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joe Fig has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joe Fig. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Fig has been accepted

[edit]
Joe Fig, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Username concern

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "CTgallery", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be a promotional and/or role account representing an organization or commercial concern. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri: Thank you for alerting me to this. I did not receive any money for working on this page, and I have changed the username. Cristintierney (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melanie Baker (March 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cristintierney! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Melanie Baker

[edit]

Hello, Cristintierney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melanie Baker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Interstellarity (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]