User talk:Danandphilcraftz

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hector Janse van Rensburg has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hector Janse van Rensburg was changed by Danandphilcraftz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955507 on 2016-11-17T08:43:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hector Janse van Rensburg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dean Dobbs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dean Dobbs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —teb728 t c 11:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hector Janse van Rensburg has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hector Janse van Rensburg was changed by Danandphilcraftz (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-12-16T04:29:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hector Janse van Rensburg.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. EdwardH (talk) 16:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Phil Lester. Rivertorch^FIRE _WATER 17:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]