User talk:Danielsmile999

December 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eli Vakil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Macedonian front, you may be blocked from editing. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 20:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to my hand Danielsmile999 (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to my hand Danielsmile999 (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robertsky. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Index of Singapore-related articles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – robertsky (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of quantum computing and communication. KylieTastic (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FU Danielsmile999 (talk) 04:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and you need to read wp:npa. Slatersteven (talk) 15:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support PAP[edit]

Talk to my hand Danielsmile999 (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YOu need to lose the attitude. Slatersteven (talk) 16:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mar 23[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 16:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to my hand Danielsmile999 (talk) 16:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respect[edit]

I am your father Danielsmile999 (talk) 16:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Parameswara (king). Why are you replacing the lead of one article with the lead of another? Aidan9382 _(talk) 07:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Parameswara_(king).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me Danielsmile999 (talk) 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me Danielsmile999 (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: Please revoke their talk page access. Nythar (💬-❄️) 10:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are allowed to ask for an unblock, but they must make a case as to why they should be unblocked, not just ask. Slatersteven (talk) 14:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]