User talk:DasRobo

DasRobo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DasRobo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Mado Kara Mieru moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mado Kara Mieru, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 02:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Satanic Bay Area moved to draftspace - one primary source, and one interview not enough to show notability

An article you recently created, Satanic Bay Area, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 15:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satanic Bay Area (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This stub neither has enough information to be encyclopedic nor speaks for itself to establish organizational notability. This stub was originally created in article space, but was then moved to draft space by User:KylieTastic, with the (correct) edit summary that it was not ready for mainspace and should be incubated. The move created a redirect in article space that was tagged for speedy deletion. The originator then restored the text of the article in article space, along with sources, and the edit summary, "Added number of citations to qualify notability of organization". The originator also added the citations to the draft. Did the citations qualify the notability of the organization? No. The first is a reporter's account of what the organization is. It appears to be significant, but also appears to be primary. The second is the organization's web site, which is unsafe and was not checked, but checking is not necessary since, as the organization's web site, it is not independent. The third and fourth are stories about a controversy about people interfering with the organization's winter tree. The fifth is a footnote referring to a book. The book may be a reliable source about its own subject matter, and so might be a reliable source for a different article, but isn't anything for a stub that doesn't say anything.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Satanic Bay Area and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Satanic Bay Area, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satanic Delco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Rose. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mado Kara Mieru

Hello, DasRobo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mado Kara Mieru, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mado Kara Mieru

Hello, DasRobo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mado Kara Mieru".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Satanic Bay Area

Hello, DasRobo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Satanic Bay Area".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]