User talk:David1212121

Welcome![edit]

Hi David1212121! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Holcman has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Holcman. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Holcman (March 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely notable but there are two references with the majority of the content containing NO references. Please see comment left by reviewer on December 17, 2021.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Holcman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Holcman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David1212121! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 04:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Holcman has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Holcman. Thanks! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Holcman (May 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Headbomb was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Holcman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Holcman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is to technical and provides too little context. For example "Active Flow Networks (AFN) is a network where the motion is propel by an active mechanism." What does that actually mean? Could you say instead something like "An active flow network is a network where the flow is propelled by a mechanism such as a pump or electrical current rather than using a mechanism such as diffusion which works on the material being carried" which makes it more approachable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 04:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Holcman has been accepted[edit]

David Holcman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (September 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by FormalDude was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

––FormalDude (talk) 03:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at David Holcman. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Yamla (talk) 10:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Ymala,

From my understanding, Professor D. Holcman has several time appeals the blocking of his account following a review edited to the late Pr. Z. Schuss, with no reponses of Wikipedia manager for more than a year.

It seems that the non reponse of the Wiki over years is clearly one of the reasons that Professor Holcman has changed account to continue giving some of his free time to contribute to the knownlesge in mathematics and physics of wikipedia.

Could you please release the page written for Professor D. Holcman so it can be downloaded by a personal from the PSL-institution that Professor Holcman Belongs to. Best wishes. David1212121 (talk) 12:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No refer to the release or to the unblock?

WP says-->

Editors in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or "proxying") unless they can show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits.

So in case of " that the changes are either verifiable or productive ", we agree for the verification,

Best wishes. David1212121 (talk) 12:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Professor Ymala,

I would like to thank you and your colleagues very much for releasing the Bibliography: all was now recovered, which was a long piece of work made by many people. Thanks again.

I have now understood the situation and my institution is going to release the bibliography. So just to let you know: the same biblio will be posted by others.

At this stage, l have also release the right on my website to use any of my sentences including by wikipedia, which was a confusion of the blockage by your colleague in holcman1.

As for the account, you are welcome to distroy this one or the two of them if you wish. Please let me know.

If you wish me to continue contributing to wikipedia, how shall I proceed?

Best wishes, D. Holman David1212121 (talk) 19:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAB explains how to contest the block. It would be deeply inappropriate for someone else to continue editing on your behalf in violation of WP:COI and WP:PROMO, see WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]