Jump to content

User talk:David Alband

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, David Alband, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 01:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 01:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Runtime edits[edit]

Per Template: Infobox film "runtime: Insert an approximate time duration of the film in minutes. Do not link to minute."--☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

assorted warnings cluttering the page

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 01:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 01:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
Your recent editing history at The Hunger Games: Catching Fire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 01:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paranormal Activity may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | runtime = 88 minutes 1 hour and 28 minutes)<br />99 minutes (1 hour and 39 minutes)<br />(Unrated cut)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bestbuy.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Divergent (film). Elizium23 (talk) 03:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Mfield (Oi!) 05:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Tinker Bell and the Lost Treasure. You were just blocked for these disruptive edits. Stop violating the manual of style. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Muppets Most Wanted[edit]

Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 12:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

Hi David, I have blocked this account indefinitely, because of your disruptive editing. Please note that this is not intended as an infinite block, but as an indefinite block. The way you've been editing and reverting is not how wikipedia works. If editors like yourself disagree with others, persevering and keeping on making the changes they find best is not the way forward, but discussion is. Because you haven't engaged in any discussion, despite people trying to reach you here on your talkpage, I have stopped this accounts ability to make any edits indefinitely. Please, when your read this message, take a moment to understand what others are trying to tell you, and if what they're trying to tell you isn't clear, don't hesitate to ask questions. Asking questions is fine. When you understand how to edit instead please appeal this block, so it can be lifted, and we can welcome you as a constructive member of the community. Remember, you aren't banned, your account is blocked to allow you to communicate, and understand what's wrong. I'm going to put a boilerplate block notice below which has information on how to appeal the block. Cheers, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]