User talk:Davidbolthouse

Welcome!

Hello, Davidbolthouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Oakdale Christian Academy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 21:35, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Oakdale Christian Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Oakdale Christian Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 21:35, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello Davidbolthouse. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to User:Davidbolthouse, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Davidbolthouse. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Davidbolthouse|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. creffett (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakdale Christian Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oakdale Christian Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lafayette Baguette ^talk 00:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakdale Christian Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oakdale Christian Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brush Creek Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brush Creek Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 16:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agape Boarding School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agape Boarding School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. creffett (talk) 16:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. John from Idegon (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Future Men

Hello, Davidbolthouse,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Future Men should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Men .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

{unblock|1=Thank you for sharing your concerns about “not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass”. The directories sited objectively feature various schools around the country, so this seemed appropriate. However, I’m happy to start fresh on citing sources.}Davidbolthouse (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Clearview Horizon

Hello, Davidbolthouse,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Clearview Horizon should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearview Horizon .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Hello Davidbolthouse. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Davidbolthouse. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Davidbolthouse|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@SamHolt6: Considering that this user received a level-4 paid warning already and did not respond, it's probably time to ban. creffett (talk) 18:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

We are NOT a paid advocate, we are a contracted, outsourced marketing and communications department for the organization, and as such have full right to write about the specific organization we work for. Surely we are allowed to write about the organization and make edits if we are legally a part of the organization, to ensure that any additions or edits are in fact true and factual. Without the organization’s input, Wikipedia would have a lot of false information from uninformed people. Davidbolthouse (talk) 20:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for finally responding. "We are NOT a paid advocate, we are a contracted, outsourced marketing and communications department for the organization" - correct me if I'm wrong, but "contracted marketing and communications department" pretty much sounds like the definition of a paid editor (unless they aren't paying you, which seems rather unlikely for a contracted marketing department). Now, given that you have managed to ignore every other paid-editing warning on this page, I would strongly recommend that you review WP:PAID and disclose that relationship on your user page, since you have done a whole lot of undisclosed paid editing so far and are right on the edge of a block for violating the Terms of Use as an undisclosed paid editor. Oh, also: your use of "we" suggests that this is a shared account. I certainly hope that it isn't, since account-sharing is also against Wikipedia policy. creffett (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

{{paid|user=Davidbolthouse|employer=Exceed Marketing Solutions}Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Waterford Country School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Waterford Country School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed paid editing. Please make a full disclosure of all paid edits to be unblocked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davidbolthouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thank you for sharing your concerns about “creating articles at a rapid rate for secondary schools with little or no notability”. These schools are fully accredited at a national level, which was noted on these articles. Some of them have less than 50 students but others are larger. I don’t believe that student body count equals notability. I’d be happy to send/add more information on the schools in question. As for your other concern of “Also virtually never has independent sources,” the directories sited objectively feature various schools around the country, so this seemed appropriate. Davidbolthouse (talk) 21:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the reason for your block, which is "undisclosed paid editing". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Caribbean Mountain Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caribbean Mountain Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caribbean Mountain Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 02:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Gateway Boys Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gateway Boys Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gateway Boys Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 02:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Columbus Girls Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Columbus Girls Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbus Girls Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 02:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brush Creek Academy

The article Brush Creek Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a treatment facility that has an educational component for its patients. It isn't primarily a school. Fails WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 05:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

{unblock|1=Thank you for sharing your concerns about “not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass”. The directories sited objectively feature various schools around the country, so this seemed appropriate. However, I’m happy to start fresh on citing sources.}Davidbolthouse (talk) 21:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of House of Hope Kansas City

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on House of Hope Kansas City, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 09:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC) {unblock|1=Thank you for sharing your concerns about “the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, etc.“. I have very little copy on this article in effort to avoid promotional language, and stay encyclopedic and to the point. Happy to rewrite or add more content if that would suffice.}Davidbolthouse (talk) 21:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Unblock requests

Please do not post multiple unblock requests all saying essentially the same thing - please post just one unblock request, which must address the actual reason for your block - "Paid editing without a full disclosure." Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

David, some of those requirements are that you post the proper disclosure templates on both your userpage and on the talk page of any article you edit for pay; that any article you create for pay go through WP:AFC, and that any edits of factual material or any major copyedits or formatting changes on existing articles that you are editing for pay be submitted for discussion at the article's talk page in the proper format with referencing. Wikipedia is not here for PR. We write about notable subjects. You will be expected to learn what is and isn't acceptable on Wikipedia, and you will be required to do your paid work in such a way that it causes the unpaid editors who make up the bulk of Wikipedians as little extra work as possible. I'd also suggest losing the thought process that led to your, to say the least, elliptical, statements above, which translated from PR-speak to English read: "We are not editing for pay, we are editing for pay". No subject deserves or is entitled to an article here; same with edits adding facts to articles. It is all decided by consensus, a large part of which is already decided and codified in the form of policies and guidelines. You will also need to address the use of this account by others. John from Idegon (talk) 22:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elk Mountain Academy

The article Elk Mountain Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a treatment program that has an educational component to its program. It is not a school pre se. The low bar for notability we afford schools is based on their position in the community as a social institution, not on the fact that they provide educational services. This place fails WP:NORG by a country mile.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Davidbolthouse (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Waterford Country School concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Waterford Country School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Waterford Country School

Hello, Davidbolthouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Waterford Country School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 01:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Providence Pass

Hello, Davidbolthouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Providence Pass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakdale Christian Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oakdale Christian Academy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 19:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Oakdale Christian Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oakdale Christian Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakdale Christian Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 00:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)