User talk:DestradoTensai

Welcome!

Hello, DestradoTensai, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Provide an Edit summary
Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken 20:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)^(talk)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mcchris.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mcchris.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 00:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Ananthabhadram/archive1

Can you take a look at the article Ananthabhadram put out for a peer review? Aditya Kabir 17:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 07:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 84

A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Snapper2

The reduced abilities section was a result of concerns over the amount of in-universe content in the article that could be detrimental to a GA run. The present abilities section, however, is rather short and could be fleshed out a bit more (see GA Sasuke Uchiha, which has three decent-sized paragraphs). Reader comprehension is as important as avoiding excessive detail. In any case, please assume good faith with his efforts, as a central goal of the past few months has been to cut down on the amount of in-universe content and related cruft that these pages were originally composed of (nothing but it rather), and recently, an attempt at GA status (although the article still needs major cleanup). If you wish to expand the section more, then go ahead, but please avoid excessive detail, be concise, and extraneous details don't need to be included. As for User:Snapper2 himself, I've known him to be a well-meaning and dedicated editor, and the "underhanded" tactics you're accusing him of are unfounded in this regard. If further conflict arises, then discuss the issue with him personally on his talk page, which I see you have not done for this issue and is certainly beneficial to avert future conflicts. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 11:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Destrado, in regards to your concern on my talk, I'm neutral on this. The information does appear to be bunk yet I don't see it as excessive. You might need another person's opinion. Sorry I couldn't be of much help. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find it difficult to have a discussion with you when you disappear for weeks at a time and, when you do surface, you wait until your next visit to respond to my comments. I do not support the meager length that is Naruto's article, as is evidenced by my bitching about it here. I would fully support lengthening it to something more akin to what can be found in the other members' of Team 7's article. At the moment it is being frowned upon for it to be any longer, so we work with the size we are allowed. As it stands, Spiraling Shuriken is used in only one battle and, under your revision, consists of half the paragraph it is in. Conversely, shadow clones and Rasengan combined take up the other half, with toads seeing no mention whatsoever. I hope you can see the reasoning behind my desire to not have one recent ability far outstrip the abilities that have been around for 200+ chapters. ~Snapper T o 04:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His fight with Mizuki throws to the wind the concept that his shadow clone numbers have increased. If anything they have regularly decreased since then. As to dividing Rasengan from Naruto's other abilities, that already exists in the article history. It was requested that it be made shorter, so it came to be its current length. ~Snapper T o 04:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 41

Have you checked List of Naruto chapters (Part II)?Tintor2 Talk Contribs 09:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to List of Naruto chapters (Part II) the volume 41 are chapters from 370 to 379. That page is not semiprotected. About Jiraiya, I cant comment about if his death. About that famous interview, it has only appeared in forums and blogs which are not reliable sources.Tintor2 Talk Contribs 11:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Kelly

Thanks for the note, I semi-protected the article for a week, let me know if it starts up again. Dreadstar † 16:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note about Jiraiya (Naruto). Check out WP:V and WP:RS for more info on sources for article content. Looks like the article is now protected, but let me know if you need further assistance. Dreadstar † 23:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kishimoto sure likes to leave us hanging doesn't he?

The whole reason that the Jiraiya infighting is going on is because Kishimoto left the Jiraiya plot where it was. I don't like it as much as the next guy, but what can we do about it? It's like the edit war on Jimmy Wales's article about his birthday. Of course Kishimoto could confirm it, but without a decent source it's all OR. Sasuke9031 (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so it's not Kishimoto that likes to leave us hanging then, but it is the rest of the world. Sure he is dead. Who cares. Wikipedia operates on verifiability, not truth. Sasuke9031 (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the... ?

You're right about that. The whole verifiability policy is ludicrous. The fact is it's still policy, and if that makes you want to quit, by all means. I am thinking about doing just that (mostly because my computer is screwing up). Sasuke9031 (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph

The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter

Issue 1

March 2008

Project News: We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002.; One editor has left the project: StuartDD.; The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.

Articles of note

New featured articles

None

New featured article candidates

Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC)

New good articles

Delisted articles: None

Proposals: A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here.; A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.; A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here.
News: The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope.; The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre ^(talk) 18:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Petition to have flagicons returned to fighter pages

I have started a petition in the hopes of having flagicons returned to MMA fighters pages. Sign here if you would like to help. Thank you. -- WölffReik (talk)

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!

Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, around noon in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 08:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!