User talk:Dlku4d

Welcome!

Hi Dlku4d! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 02:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Heat death of the universe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Heat death of the universe was changed by Dlku4d (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868657 on 2020-08-30T13:30:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heat death of the universe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 16:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Heat death of the universe, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Heat death of the universe. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. , as you did again at Heat death of the universe. David notMD (talk) 15:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A note to patrollers

I had to rewrite the article's misleading lead-in because the universe evolves ever further away from a thermal equilibrium. Read the first paragraph of the Concept section for explanation. Dlku4d (talk) 04:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notification

As you were notified at Talk:supraorganism, I have opened a sock puppet investigation regarding your move of Superorganism. Just plain Bill (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moves

Hi. Please don't move established pages without opening a requested moves discussion. Especially don't move pages when you've already been challenged on the move.

Regarding content, please mind the bold-revert-discuss cycle.

– Thjarkur (talk) 11:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dlku4d You stated in your edit summary at Supraorganism that consensus per the talk page was to move it to that name. Either you are intentionally deceiving other editors or you've misread the talk page. In either case, please move it back, otherwise I'm afraid I will be requesting a block as you've repeatedly moved things against consensus. Praxidicae (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Please re-read the above. There is consensus against your edits, so you should not re-instate them. You risk being blocked if you continue edit warring. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your recent editing history at Superorganism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You're also edit warring by your moves and WP:OR. Praxidicae (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]