User talk:Dm89263

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

You must cite sources if you want to update values. – Þjarkur (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dm89263, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Dm89263! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

May 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Interstate 80 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Interstate 80 was changed by Dm89263 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986203 on 2020-05-20T18:32:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Harvey. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hurricane Harvey was changed by Dm89263 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90858 on 2020-05-20T18:35:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hurricane Harvey, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dm89263 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry and won't do it again, I was testing how many warnings 'till blocked

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dm89263 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry and won't do it again, I was testing how many warnings 'till blocked and I created a new account so i wasn't blocked

Decline reason:

You have violated two of core policies, and have provided only a brief explanation. You will need to explain that you know why your actions were wrong, what you will edit in the future, and list any sockpuppet accounts you created, in order to be unblocked. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dm89263 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand vandilizing was wrong, next time I will only edit if and only if the edit is correct (I may make occasional mistakes though, but zero chance of vandalizm). My other account was dm89258.

Decline reason:

As you are unwilling to answer the questions given, there are no grounds to consider lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 10:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dm89263 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand vandilizing was wrong because it ruins wiki pages, next time I will only edit if and only if the edit is correct (I may make occasional mistakes though, but zero chance of vandalizm). My other account was dm89258.

Decline reason:

I agree with the withdrawal of your ability to make further appeals - this explanation is still not sufficient. MER-C 18:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 31507[edit]

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/31507 is now closed.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not fully address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]