- 1 North Shields
- 2 The Hostmen of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
- 3 DYK
- 4 re-Keelmen
- 5 Sorted History of Newcastle upon Tyne
- 6 DYK nom
- 7 William Jessop
- 8 DYK
- 9 Orphaned non-free media (Image:John Fowler002.jpg)
- 10 Matthew Murray
- 11 Newcastle town wall
- 12 Robert de Mowbray
- 13 Newcastle town wall GA review
- 14 Cooper's Lonsdale belts
- 15 Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
- 16 Segundum
- 17 Dere Street
- 18 The White Queen (novel)
- 19 Talkback
- 20 Fred Lanchester
- 21 Notification of automated file description generation
- 22 File:Blackfriars1.JPG missing description details
- 23 Disambiguation link notification for April 16
- 24 ArbCom elections are now open!
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article North Shields are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks!
- Regarding article North Shields and your comments. I am fairly new to Wikipedia, especially to amending articles. I have placed a source reference on the North Shields article. Is that what you had in mind? Please let me know if it is not.
- Dposte46 18:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's okay - it is preferred to be slightly more robust about referencing though. That is, statements and paragraphs need to indicate from which source they are derived. Sorry to be vain enough to use "my own" article as an example, but take a look at Holy Trinity, Sunderland to see what I mean. However, a lot of articles in Wikipedia just have a source placed at the end like yours, but in practice this is not good, as a lot of sources may be used to construct an article, and it is ideal to know exactly how each source is used. I'll have a go at showing in the North Shields article how to reference your submission. Read the advice above on referencing for a better explanation.
Hi, just thought I'd say I'm impressed by this new article. I hope you don't mind, but I've suggested it for a future Did You Know column on the main page - if you'd like to change the proposed entry, it can be found here. Thanks, and keep up the good work! Bob talk 20:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|The Original Barnstar|
|Great work on the Hostmen article — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 22:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)|
--Carabinieri 12:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorted History of Newcastle upon Tyne
Hi, don't worry, it was just a small / missing in one of the references that did it. Incidentally, anybody can revert back to any version in the article history, which is useful if somebody makes an edit to an article you don't think is very good, etc. Bob talk 21:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi - I saw this article and I was going to nominate it for DYK but it only had one ref and no pics. I have added some more refs but its still short of a picture. At a quick glance they may think he was using a traction engine so a diagram and a photo would be portrait. Do you know where there is a "free" one? Anyway and nonetheless .. hope you like the nom.
- ...that it was John Fowler who won the 1858 prize of the Royal Agricultural Society for mechanical cultivation using winches and a steam engine? by User:Dposte46 nom. by Victuallers 12:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Re. image. He died in 1864. If you have a photo/scan of him or of a painting/drawing that was done in his lifetime then its out of copyright. The law is 70 years after authors death. People mark these as copyright but only out of laziness. It also has to be a "true image", ie if I put a moustache or the mona lisa then its my image and I own it. Hope that helps. Victuallers 20:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:John Fowler002.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:John Fowler002.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
You have substaially expanded the above article. Have you used additional sources? If so, could you please cite them? I am not questioning your work, except that it will be incomplete without references (assuming there are others). Peterkingiron 17:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- On second thoughts, I think the above comment may be misplaced. I had missed the citation of Rolt. Peterkingiron 18:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Newcastle town wall
Hi Dposte46, I'm planning on expanding the Newcastle town wall article a little further, and hopefully get it to Good Article status. I noticed you expanded the article considerably a while back, including references for some of the info. There are some bits which are unreferenced though, and I was wondering if it would be possible for you to add further refs for them. I'm thinking mainly the last three paragraphs of the "Construction" section and the bit about the merchants' houses in Close. Ideally, book references should cite page numbers, but I don't think that is a requirement for GA, so might not be necessary. Anyway, i'd appreciate any help with this. Cheers, Dbam Talk/Contributions 22:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Dbam Talk/Contributions 20:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- In fact, I've just noticed your edits to the article, that's quick work! Again, thanks. Dbam Talk/Contributions 20:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Dposte46, I saw you've added a lot of text to that biography. I saw too you used oxforddnb.com as a source. I wrote Montbray's article for the french wiki, but with not so reliable source, so could it be possible for you to send me that DNB's article thru mail ? Thanks in advance ! Regards, PurpleHz (talk) 01:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wrongly thought it was possible to send attachments thru Special:Emailuser/PurpleHz. You can obtain my e-mail address by adding @gmail.com to my username (sorry, i don't want to write it in plain text). Thanks again ! PurpleHz (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Newcastle town wall GA review
Hello, just to let you know (if you don't already) that Newcastle town wall has received a Good Article review. Some of the points raised concern text that was added by yourself and I was hoping you could have a look if you have a moment. The review can be found at the article's talk page and will be in place for a week from today before it is passed or failed. As before, any help will be appreciated, thanks. Dbam Talk/Contributions 21:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Cooper's Lonsdale belts
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Apologies for the cockup - I had a browser crash when my broadband link went down. I had the page in previiew and can only assume it somehow got updated. I certainly didn't delete all that section in my in-progress editI. always carefully check my edits, but on this occasion was working on another page as well, and didn't think to go back and check if anything bad had happened. (hangs head in shame). I hope my final version will make up for it! Rambler24 (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Dposte46. I note that you have edited Dere Street in the past. I thought you might be interested to know that I have today expanded Dere Street by 3000 bytes, so it only needs 2000 more bytes in the next 4 days to get it into Do You Know. I have mostly transferred information from another page I've been editing, and I've added a whole load of Dere-Street category images from Geograph to Commons, but I don't have the expertise to provide the remaining 2000 bytes of info. So I'm just giving you the heads up in case you want to take this opportunity of completing the expansion to the minimum 5000 new bytes for DYK.--Storye book (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Update: due to the time factor, until I hear from you I'll continue to edit it a little, but please feel free to undo my edits and do it properly at any time. I'm starting by trying to sort out some sources which I'm adding as inline refs.--Storye book (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The White Queen (novel), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.whitequeenstore.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I have blanked this article as a continuing copyright problem, it's still a close paraphrase and needs further rewriting (in my opinion at least). VernoWhitney (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I notice there is this statement which seems to have been inserted by you in his article. (I quote) "the first motorboat built in Britain". I wonder if the explanation for this statement would be that it needs to be qualified by something like "the first motorboat built in - this part of - Britain".
Would you mind checking your source (Rolt, L.T.C., "Great Engineers", 1962, G. Bell and Sons, ISBN) and confirm that it has been accurately quoted? Thanks and regards, Eddaido (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Blackfriars2.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Blackgate1.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Blackfriars1.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Blackfriars1.JPG missing description details
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rory Kinnear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)