User talk:Dr.Narasimha Prabhu

"Gain knowledge and share it"

Welcome!

Hello, Dr.Narasimha Prabhu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Goud Saraswat Brahmin. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Haploidavey (talk) 09:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 21:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ya I am damn sure no controversial info is written there.That topic is as per the rule of wiki. Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your recent editing history at Goud Saraswat Brahmin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 22:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do consider if I am not wrong

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As per my knowledge I thought of discussing the issue in the tale page did I committed any actions against wiki policy?Please decide by yourself Hoping for one chance to discuss in talk pageDr.Narasimha Prabhu (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; this account is not blocked directly. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. This will allow us to find your block! Yamla (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is showing Ip addr ban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why it is showing Ip addr ban? Did is void the policy of wiki anywhere?Please review soon Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; there's nothing indicating this account, or the IP it has used, has been blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't have access to your IP address. You'll need to follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to edit. This may require providing us your IP address. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. --Yamla (talk) 18:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect there's a connection with the recently blocked sock User:Rexin lobo who edited at Talk:Goud Saraswat Brahmin, and mentioned Dr.Narasimha Prabhu in this edit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dr.Narasimha Prabhu is editing from the same topics from the same individually allocated /64 range as User:Rexin lobo, who I blocked this morning. I've now blocked this account directly.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope this is unfair

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes rexin lobo was my sub account that I created to add discussion in the talk page(I hope adding discussion is not against wiki rule rite?)but how can you connect that wiki with user named servesh? Main account is this and rexin is actual sub account basically created since this was not working I don’t know what happened in that page but as per my knowledge I kept 3 point discussion in the talk page(Note I didn’t edited anything there!) How I violated wiki rule?Can and administrated help me to sort it out Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (talk) 03:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're clearly here to just promote an agenda. I'm declining this and withdrawing talk page access. —SpacemanSpiff 04:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unfair move

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See my edits in this account and lobo account if you find anything against wiki rule delete my account but Don’t connect me with someone else and mark it as socket inturn making blocking as main objective is not fair isn’t it?You have my Ip addr and account login details then still Why to block on suspection?Dr.Narasimha Prabhu (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate to above. —SpacemanSpiff 04:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.