User talk:Drawlings10

May 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kiki's Delivery Service has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kiki's Delivery Service was changed by Drawlings10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95515 on 2014-05-10T14:58:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Lou Retton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mary Lou Retton was changed by Drawlings10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953006 on 2014-05-10T15:10:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nastia Liukin. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — Abhishek ^Talk 15:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Nadia Comăneci, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Nadia Comăneci was changed by Drawlings10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854 on 2014-05-10T15:15:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Katelyn Ohashi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Iselilja (talk) 21:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samantha Peszek may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| collegeteam = [[UCLA Bruins gymnastics (2010-2014)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have repaired the damage referred to in the message immediately above. To be honest, I am surprised you apparently didn't notice that your edit completely exploded the article's infobox. Please would you try to take more care in future? I recommend that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made. Thanks! – Wdchk (talk) 04:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, My Neighbor Totoro, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Mary Lou Retton[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! StudiesWorld (talk) 23:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Star Tours—The Adventures Continue, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zappa 24 Mati 04:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With this edit to the article Svetlana Khorkina, you added a note to the infobox stating that she formerly represented Romania. I was unable to find any mention of this in the body of the article. Please stop adding unsourced content – this contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Wdchk (talk) 03:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Norfolk State Spartans, Kyla Ross, Vanessa Ferrari, Beth Tweddle and He Kexin. – Wdchk (talk) 03:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent addition of unsourced text., as you did at Kobe Bryant. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Bagumba (talk) 03:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With this edit to the article Jordyn Wieber, you added unverifiable information about the future. You did this even though a previous addition of the same text had been removed by another editor. Please read WP:CRYSTAL. You have previously been blocked for adding unsourced content. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked again. By now you should be familiar with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 12:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: It was necessary to revert several other edits you made on August 18 and 19, for the same reason: no sources and unverifiable. – Wdchk (talk) 05:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Morgan State Bears. – Wdchk (talk) 00:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Corkythehornetfan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Norfolk State University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 15:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Norfolk State University, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 18:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Drawlings10. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Drawlings10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]