User talk:Dsj1408

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Dsj1408! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Bonnett (October 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Charles Bonnett Photo Bio.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Young Chuck Bonnett.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Young Chuck Bonnett.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Bonnett (November 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Rankersbo (talk) 12:02, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Dsj1408, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 12:02, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charles Bonnett, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Bonnett[edit]

Hello, Dsj1408. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Charles Bonnett".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Charles Bonnett}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your email[edit]

I have read your email. The reason for deletion of Draft:Charles Bonnett was simply that you had not edited for a very long time, making it look as though the draft might never become an article. Since you have now expressed an interest in working on it again, that reason no longer applies, so I have restored the draft.

Early versions of the draft read rather like a résumé for the subject, as though it were written to impress us with his career, rather than to tell us in about him in a neutral manner, as required for a Wikipedia article. It is difficult to pick out any one statement which looked blatantly promotional, but there was, I think, an overall tone to the draft which gave that feeling. Later, you edited the draft and made it much more neutral in tone, so I don't see that as a significant problem. The copy you left in your user page did, however, retain that rather promotional tone. However, the main reason for deletion of the user page was that it was being used for long-term storage of an article-like page which was not suitable as an article. It was also redundant, as it duplicated the draft at Draft:Charles Bonnett, and for that reason I don't see any advantage in restoring it.

I think I should let you know that it is quite likely that any work put into editing the draft may well be wasted, as it may never be acceptable as an article. I have read the draft, and also searched online for further information about Charles Bonnett, and I have not been able to find any evidence that he satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. While various problems with articles can be put right by careful editing, no amount of editing an article can change the notability of the subject of the article. When you submitted the draft for review for a second time, the submission was declined because of a lack of sources, and links were given to three pages on reliable sources, referencing, and citing sources. I suggest that you have a look at those pages if you haven't already, but I also suggest that even more important is to look at the notability guidelines, since, as I have already indicated, if a subject does not satisfy those guidelines then no amount of work on other issues will make the article acceptable.

I don't know whether you are only interested in creating an article about Charles Bonnett, or whether you would like to contribute to Wikipedia in other areas, but if you are interested in contributing in other ways, my advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make (which you will, because we all do) will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charles Bonnett, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Bonnett[edit]

Hello, Dsj1408. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Charles Bonnett".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 12:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]