User talk:Editelefant

Welcome

Hello, Editelefant, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Editelefant, good luck, and have fun. Moja TT (talk) 05:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Dromayor. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok got it. Im an new and happy to learn. Thanks. Editelefant (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hector Villa Osorio (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Héctor Villa Osorio, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hector Villa Osorio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hector Villa Osorio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editelefant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 07:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Héctor Villa Osorio (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Significant in-depth coverage in reliable source are essential. Presented sources are not covering the topic significantly. See WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Héctor Villa Osorio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Héctor Villa Osorio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dromayor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dromayor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dromayor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dromayor. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 14:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dromayor; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Transcendental36 (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Héctor Villa Osorio

@Editelefant: Don't not revert the above article back from redirect. It has no effective references. scope_creep^Talk 07:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Dromayor, you may be blocked from editing. scope_creep^Talk 07:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Héctor Villa Osorio. Restoring from redirect of a non-notable page. scope_creep^Talk 13:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whats going on. Its clearly notable. Ample references are given. You are unilateraly blannking a page. Not even opening a discussion o prposing a merger. Stop blanking the page. Editelefant (talk) 13:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Héctor Villa Osorio

Hi @Editelefant: Would you please find some additional references for the above article. The man is likely notable, and I posted it to Afd as the references are very poor, but there was at least two references in the Droymayer article, that were ideal for the subject. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 07:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will find refs. I was also finding more for dromayor. The thing is that the public libraries are still closed because of covid so i havent been able to go. Best regards. Editelefant (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article can be recreated at some point and with better references. Can you please sign your eh, signature by using ~~~~ The software converts into a full signature. scope_creep^Talk 13:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~editelefant~~ Editelefant (talk) 14:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editelefant (talk) 14:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Check Google Books. scope_creep^Talk 20:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Editelefant (talk) 23:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]