User talk:Editor-Milburn

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

As a consultant since 2012, I have worked with a number of non-profit and commercial businesses to help them shape their brand messaging, including Insite Security.Editor-Milburn (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make explicit on the talk pages of both Falkenbergs' articles that you have been editing here on their behalf without making disclosure. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False positive

Sorry about the false positive. I'm new to edit filters, and didn't correctly consider the consequences of mine. Anything with Dan should be able to go through now.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kai Falkenberg (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a CV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kai Falkenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kai Falkenberg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 03:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor-Milburn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brad v 03:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kai Falkenberg 2017.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kai Falkenberg 2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kai Falkenberg (September 13, 2018)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still reads like a CV. Almost certainly WP:UPE. I spot checked a couple of the carpet-bomb of references, and didn't find any that were useful towards meeting WP:BIO. Please see WP:THREE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kai Falkenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kai Falkenberg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:36, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: Kai Falkenberg. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hi – I serve as Editor for Christopher Falkenberg’s Wikipedia page and someone has deleted it. There were a number of legitimate print media references with links. The page was not promotional or advertising. There was no explicit content on the page. What can I do to restore the page? A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. • 11:10, 31 December 2021 Explicit talk contribs deleted page Christopher Falkenberg (Expired PROD, concern was: No WP:SIGCOV, just citations in newspapers) Tag: Twinkle (thank) • 21:08, 12 May 2009 Frank talk contribs deleted page Christopher Falkenberg (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) Editor-Milburn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC) Editor-Milburn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: Christopher Falkenberg --Orange Mike | Talk 22:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A WP:PROD deletion can be undone by requesting a WP:REFUND. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 20:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]