User talk:Editor12122

Editor12122, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Editor12122, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Ekips39. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Love Me like You Do seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ekips39 (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As above, but on Cruel (The Veronicas song). Please stop adding your personal opinions to the articles. Wikipedia depends on reliable sources and a neutral point of view. Sjö (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to King (Years & Years song)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Years & Years, you may be blocked from editing. SpeedDemon520 (talk) 00:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism, as you did at Cruel (The Veronicas song). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 02:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor12122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i promise not to edit stupid pages Editor12122 (talk) 04:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 11:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor12122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. i promise i will not vandalise wikipedia anymore Editor12122 (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Right after this unblock request you posted this. Read the above decline and post a reasonable unblock request or your talk page access will be revoked too. —SpacemanSpiff 09:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor12122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I will never vandalise wikipedia or threaten people ever again on Wikipedia. Editor12122 (talk) 04:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to question below after a week. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am willing to consider unblocking you. I have known other people who have started here as vandals who have been unblocked and become constructive editors, and I am willing to give you a chance to do so. However, in view of your extensive history of disruptive editing, I will be more inclined to unblock if you can give us an indication of what sort of editing you are likely to do if you are unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As an observer, can I suggest that you need to answer the question asked by JamesBWatson above. If you don't, and just keep repeating the same unblock request, I fear you will lose the ability to edit even this page. Time is getting shorter, so you need to start listening and act on what you're being asked to do before it's too late. 82.35.107.31 (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor12122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't want to be banned forever from editing. Please unblock me! I will not ever again vandalise wikipedia anymore Editor12122 (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have a history of making only disruptive edits to Wikipedia and, despite JamesBWatson's invitation for you to do so (and 82.35.107.31's helpful suggestion in this regarding yesterday), you have again failed to indicate what useful contributions you would make if unblocked. This is your fourth unblock request without meaningfully addressing your conduct so, to avoid further administrative time being wasted here, I am now going to remove your ability to edit this page. WJBscribe (talk) 12:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Alec Sanders in 2006.jpg

The file File:Alec Sanders in 2006.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

personal photo, out of project scope

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]