User talk:Electoralreform

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah

Hello Electoralreform. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "George Farah".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah. JohnCD (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah

Hello Electoralreform. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "George Farah".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Farah (Activist) (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~KvnG 05:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Electoralreform, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~KvnG 05:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Farah (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Farah (writer) (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

I am not even sure what this guy is. There needs to be more structure. There needs to be a rewrite, a total rewrite

There also needs to be more prose. Segments such as "Farah has been interviewed on over 50 television programs to discuss presidential elections, legal developments, and foreign policy in the Middle East, including "Nightline," "NOW with Bill Moyers,"[10] "20/20,"[11] "CBS Evening News,"[12] "NBC Nightly News," "CNN Lou Dobbs Tonight,"[13] "Countdown with Keith Olbermann,"[14] "ABC World News," "Fox & Friends," "CNN American Morning," "MSNBC's Lester Holt Live," "Al-Jazeera's Inside Story,"[15] “BBC World News,” and "C-Span Washington Journal."[16][17]" are both lazy and pointless. We need to know what people said about him not that he said stuff and what he said

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS

You may not use his own work as a reference except in special circumstances. Let me try to explain. If s/he manufactured vacuum cleaners, the cleaners would be her/his work. A vacuum cleaner could not be a reference for her/him, simply because it is the product he makes. So it is with his writing, etc. However, a review of her/his work by others tends to be a review of her/him and her/his methods, so is a reference.

Lose Youtube. It is not a suitable reference.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Farah (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 22:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Farah (writer) has been accepted

George Farah (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mz7 (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]