User talk:Ericorbit/Archive26

Cover Versions

Cover versions don't get separate articles on WP. Well done. I have a few more that need doing, is it worth running a list? Richhoncho (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Ho Hum, I have reduced the widdy list and added a second list. Richhoncho (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

And yet more good work, I will add a few more later that have been linked to the coverversions discussion but have already been merged. That should establish a pretty good precedent that cover versions don't get separate articles. Now to emphasis this, what we really need is a new category Category:Redirects from cover versions, probably a hidden category and I think we have established WP procedure once and for all. What say you? Feel free to answer here or back at my talkpage. Richhoncho (talk) 15:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for delayed response - thanks, I will continue to add to the list as I come across them, and I'll also keep merging and crossing stuff off the list. I see you've been adding that hidden category already? That works for me, I'll begin using it. Perhaps we can remind some users who participated in the past conversation that it still exists and there is cleanup work to be done? - eo (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

No probs. The category I am adding is an existing category which I thought appropriate. I'd be more careful before creating a new cat. Am still working on a list of already merged songs. Richhoncho (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

versions de couverture

I would merge different versions (a look at the tiddly-widdly list will confirm my opinion) with the original version being the article name - doesn't create any search problems because there will be a redirect anyway. Also, I would list different versions in chronological order which avoids not only WP:OPINION and My band is more important than that band arguments. Do you concur? --Richhoncho (talk) 13:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes and yes. - eo (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Aaliyah

I have cited references! I did not put false references. is an slide show from Univision! move to the pic10, in photo 10, Spanish: "'One in a Million' Vendio 3.7 millones de copies en America."

English: One In A Million Sold 3.7 million copies in the U.S..

reverse the edition, please!

the text is on the right side of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInAMillion96 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

comment added by OneInAMillion96 (talk • —Preceding undated comment added 02:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC).

No, this is not an acceptable link. First, readers should not have to browse thru 10 or 15 or 20 pages to "find" the text you're talking about. What you've put there is a photo gallery. And again, in the English-language Wikipedia, citations should be from sources that are in the English language. - eo (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

There is no rule against it, and Wikipedia sources can accept any language. As an example, references on the Oricon, in Japanese. There is no problem of walking a few pictures.--ΛΛLIYΛH (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Eo, plz it's been confirmed

I just gave out 2 sources for fame, chris browns new album, and in a radio interview Chris Brown confirmed it was called FAME. The title was even tattooed on his arm! DO U WANT MORE SOURCES? FAME is reallly confirmed. I know its unreleased but its confirmed! I have more sources. The singles "Yeah 3x" and "Calypso" were confirmed, too. I saw it with my own eyes. Come on, plz! (RealityShowsRock (talk) 12:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC))

PS I will jot down more sources after doing research...

The problem here is it violating WP:NALBUM and WP:DISCOG. I understand your enthusiasm, but we cannot rely on blogs or fan sites for stuff like this. Things that work are: announcements on the artist's official website, confirmation by record label (or on the label's website or calendar of upcoming releases), an official press release (in which case you would see it reported in trade sources such as Billboard, etc.), coverage of the release by third-party sources. Since I have now shown you subpage creation, this is a perfect example for you to use one. If you want to begin the article for the new album you may create and use your subpage to begin the new article. Here you can format it, add the sources as you get them, etc., and invite others to contribute. Then, once the release is confirmed and notable per a consensus, you can move the contents of your subpage to a "real" article page. But until you have enough reliable sources, the unreleased material should stay off the discography page. - eo (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I researched and I saw a USA TODAY link on Yeah 3x. USA today isnt a blog right? (RealityShowsRock (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC))

USA Today is good, yes. And just a heads-up: many of these "upcoming album" articles end up being nominated at WP:AfD and redirected/deleted because fans just want to rush to be the "first" to post stuff and create articles. This almost never works. Patience almost always pays off in situations like this. If you come to the table with an already-created, sourced, well-written, non-stub article, chances are others will be much more willing to let it remain in place. Articles with little or no credible information and/or a fansite-vibe or "here's the latest news on Chris Brown's album!" tone just get hosed. I'd start, perhaps, with a small mention, perhaps a sentence or two in Brown's artist page, noting that an album is in the works. Then hold off on the addition to the discography unless sources become obvious and overwhelming. - eo (talk) 14:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Okay, but I'm saying now they have a couple MTV.com links, too. So I think it's overwhelming quite a bit. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 19:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC))

Removing of my Antibullying signup

Ok so, I saw that u deleted it. And you said in ur edit summary, move to subpage. So, do I just create one or do I have to read something or what? (RealityShowsRock (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC))

WAIT NEVER MIND I JUST SAW UR INSTRUCTIONS. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 14:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC))

Bubbling Under

Hi Eric, I noticed that in the past you have helped users with locating the Bubbling Under peaks of some songs. This link shows that this song by Lady Gaga and Elton John charted on the Bubbling Under chart, but as I do not have a billboard.biz account, I cannot access its peak. If you could help me out, I would greatly appreciate it so that I can add the info to Lady Gaga discography. Much thanks in advance! –Chase (talk) 02:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much! –Chase (talk) 19:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Love Don't Live Here Anymore

Eric would you take a look at the updated version of the article and comment about how it looks? Thanks mate. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Done! Overall this looks excellent, there were just some minor things I fixed. I removed the Rose Royce image however - that looks to be one for an album cover, not the real single cover. Amazon fucked that up. - eo (talk) 12:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh is it? Any idea what is the single cover? If you find it, can you upload over that image? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Eric. That was really helpful. I might ask of a small favour. Since you have access to the billboard.biz, cna you find out if the LDLHA Madonna version debuted at 6 on the Bubbling Under chart. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Sllewellyn7

hey, could you have a look at the above users contribs cuz he's constantly changing things about, formatting wise, despite tons of warnings from various people (you included) and blockings from you. thanks. oh and with cece peniston, i'd be tempted to change it and point him/her in the direction of wp:discog and some fl's to see how things are done. otherwise they'd think that having flags and incorrect formatting, chart names etc for discogs is ok, better to teach them proper ways early if they're new to wiki. Mister sparky (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

CCP

Peniston's "Finally '97" ain't a cover version, it is a new recording of the same artist. Once such song succesfully charts it can appear in a new article as well if preferred. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuliak (talk • contribs) 14:04, 23 September 2010

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/91.8.213.91

Done.—Kww(talk) 14:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Basic Instinct (album)

Its ok I didn't see it first either. Its only a temp. thing. Anyday know I'm expecting a full track listing to be announced (fingers crossed), but then with ciara i wouldnt be surprise if its pushed back... AGAIN! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 15:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Tut-tut

I honestly spat out the drink I was drinking when I saw this (and the edit summary). I was going to say... "OMG Eric, you're always level headed but to tell someone 'F*ck You', its just not like you" until I realised you're on about the Cee Lo song. LOL -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 16:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Haha, yes, I usually copy the article-in-question as the edit summary when I leave warnings. That does look kinda bad, doesn't it. - eo (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)  Nicely done GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I'm also waiting for eo to warn somebody for disruptive edits to this article. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Linkin Park discography

Hi Eric. About the size of the certifications... when there are so many certifications is better to put them in small, because it may look messy in normal size font. Or at least I was told that. Like Michael Jackson albums discography (certifications and sales). I added this to WP:DISCOG. By the way I saw you are top contributor on this article (via toolserver). I'm trying to make the article a featured list . I reciently nominated it but failed because I'm having trouble with the references and the lead. I'm not a pro on the subject so it would rock if you can help with that.--Neo139 (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem - I remove the small on so many discographies its almost a habit at this point. I thought maybe LP's had too many and may get switched back, which is fine; they have a lot. Meanwhile I'll take a look at the lead. What is your problem with the references? - eo (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Apparently the references are a mess. I'm fixing them and put them like this but I'm not sure what to put in publisher in cite web tag. I'll do all I can and then ask these guys to review it. I can't fix the lead by myself because my english is not enough to do it --Neo139 (talk) 21:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for contact me. I was AFK the whole week (physics exam). Anyway, I post a message on MatthewGoodfan101 talk page (see here). Lets see if he calms down. (Last edit he did screw the tables lol). I think the solution to all this is to find an absolute consensus for which charts select for each section though a mathematical formula. So if someone start trolling for his country to be included, we can let the math decide ^^ That is why I just created this. Also please vote in the link or dont link poll. Its an easy and simple thing that need speedy consensus. About Matthew, this are the type of users that we don't have to block, he wants to help but he doesn't know much about discussion before editing and needs to read a bit of WP:HELP. It would be a shame if he gets blocked for this --Neo139 (talk) 00:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I have added Linkin Park discography for peer review. If you can check the article and see if anything wrong with it, it would help. Thanks --Neo139 (talk) 03:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Beyoncé Knowles discography

Hi, actually i did the older changes taking as a model the FA article Kelly Rowland discography. Sorry for replying late. Can you advise me? Jivesh boodhun (talk) 18:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

thanks. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 11:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Source granting

Hello, do you remember a while ago when we brought an issue up about Mariah Journal being a fan-site and now we can use it as a source for certain things? How did it come about that it was granted? I can't remember where to take it. Jayy008 (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Its time

Just wanted to say y'all are simply doing so much good jobs. I'm really proud of you. I have come to say good-bye for now. We will meet again if I return. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to comment: Formatting changes to WP:DISCOGSTYLE.

Hello, Eric. I know you're at least somewhat aware of these discussions, but I want to solicit your comment before we start changing discogs wp-wide. And trust me, the executive summary I'm clogging your talk page with here is much shorter than all the rest of what's gone before.

Quick summary: Over at the Talk page for WP:WikiProject Discographies/style, there's been quite a bit of (at times tedious and technical) discussion about the formatting of discographies. Although WikiProject Discographies/style hopes to be part of the Manual of Style some day, it does not, currently, conform to WP:ACCESS, itself a part of the MoS. This is a problem because articles which conform to the WikiProject Discographies/style ought not be acceptable for promotion to FA or FL status, since they don't conform to the MoS.

After much discussion at Accessibility issues, followed by what was meant to be a conclusion at Time to update, we would be ready to actively address the problem, with discographies eventually being reformatted to appear as currently shown here (already changed from its earlier form). Column order and formatting would be noticeably changed, chart headings would typically be bigger, a few other differences in the coding would be made.

The only hold-up (as far as we know) is lack of wider consensus; I think too few people have participated and I'd like to see more editors register their opinion (be it support or criticism) before we move ahead with a rather significant change. (At the very least, you may consider this fair warning.) Your comment is welcome at Are we ready to apply this updated guideline?. Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Janet Jackson discography

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I'm in the process of cleaning up this page.., (Adding sources, putting correct numbers, etc.) and splitting it as well. Ga Be 19 19:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones

I put the tags on the article. Most all of the article is fine, but the lead is indeed unattractive, and I believe it needs to be rewritten, cleaned up, and wikified. I also believe that the lead possibly contains trivia. Nowyouseemetalk2me 21:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

OK then - wasn't sure of the who or why they were placed there - I'll review the lead again and redo what is necessary. Care to help me with it? - eo (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing studly.. I'll take a look at it when I get on later today. ;-) Nowyouseemetalk2me 11:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

OK so I went ahead and did it, you can take a look at it and tell me what you think. I removed quite a fair bit that i feel didn't really belong there, added a logo, and tweaked a few other things. Nowyouseemetalk2me 23:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi

I'm using this one because I can't access to the another account and I don't know why.--JY4ever (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

User:OneInAMillion

Hello Eric!! I am writing you to request your help in resolving the continuous disruptive edits by User:OneInAMillion96. He has created the pages Aaliyah 2001 World Tour, Age Ain't Nothing but a Number World Tour, and One In A Million World Tour which shouldn't even exist, and has continuously added this edit to One in a Million (Aaliyah album). Along with these edits, he has disrupted Janet Jackson releated articles as well. Can you please block this user already, thanks. Ga Be 19 21:12, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome

Thank you for the welcome =)--ΛΛLIYΛH (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I don't think you have any idea what I meant when messages/warnings were left on your Talk Page. - eo (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Toni Braxton

Hello, I'm and the editor User talk:Carmaker1 have problems with the editor User talk:68.167.83.210. User talk:Carmaker1presented references that Toni Braxton was born in 1966, but the editor User talk:68.167.83.210 always destroys. Can you block this page ?--ΛΛLIYΛH (talk) 17:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Before complaining about other editors, have you acknowledged any of the warnings and comments left on your talk page? You are either ignoring them completely or you do not understand them at all. - eo (talk) 17:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I only ask for your help.

• I think I do a good job for Wikipedia. I rephrased the discography of Aaliyah, with all the right references, you can check.
• I thought the first week sales of Age Is not Nothing But a Number "and" One in a Million. In addition to reformulating these articles.
• I thought the 'End of year charts' of One in a Million and Aaliyah, plus the albums of Janet (All For You, Damita Jo, 20YO, Discipline and janet.)
• I thought the sales of Aaliyah (32 million albums).
• I attended all the discussions about me, as in the Discography Aaliyah, Aaliyah Article)
• I inserted the sales in the discography of albums and Monica and Brandy.
• I'm fixing up the discography Toni Braxton, who was without references.
• Mya's albums and Discography.
• Ultimate Aaliyah, I Care 4 U.
• Blackground Records
• Mos Def discography.
• Ciara discography

I would love to stay in Wikipedia.--ΛΛLIYΛH (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Rap-Up

Question: is the website of Rap-Up considered a reliable source? I know it's a magazine (which I have never seen in stores, but maybe they don't sell it in Canada), but its website makes it seem as if it's primarily a blog-like website that seems more focused on and covers every single rap and hip hop leak, new track, and album. I never use it for my additions, but I don't know if I should be telling IPs that it isn't a reliable source or not. What do you think? Yves (talk) 02:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for delayed response, but personally i dont find this site to be reliable at all. Per comments Ive seen from other editors, Rap-Up is frequently wrong about stuff, so I would avoid it. At least I always do. - eo (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

That's okay; thanks for the reply! I guess my question is, "Should I be removing content if its most reliable source seems to be Rap-Up?" And, "Would I be able use the Template:uw-unsourced1 templates on talk pages of users who add with Rap-Up as a source?" Yves (talk) 23:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Sigh, I guess I would look at the entire article as a whole and see how much of the article is based on Rap-Up. At the very least I'd place a cleanup tag on the article and try to get something started on the talk page before removing tons of info. If it's blatantly an all-rumor article you may even want to consider taking it to WP:AfD. Getting a consensus from other editors wouldn't hurt, and FYI, a lot of tags can be found here: Wikipedia:Template messages. - eo (talk) 11:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Moving a page

Hi. Can you help me move Jack Starr (blues guitarist) to Jack Starr. I can't because there was already an unknown guitarist on the Jack Starr article. I moved that one to Jack Starr (Texas guitarist). The reason I did this is because there is no point of having a two line stub in the Jack Starr article about a probably non-notable 60's guitarist when people that search for jack starr are looking for the metal one (Jack Starr (blues guitarist)). Also 99% of the articles linking to Jack Starr refereed to the blues one. I have fixed this 1% that didn't so there will be no problems with the move. Thanks --Neo139 (talk) 21:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

done - eo (talk) 22:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! --Neo139 (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello....

Errrrrrrrrric! Sorry I just so had the urge to do that. Lol, its an excuse for me to ask how you are buddy? Not run into you for a few days... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Yoooooo, I'm here, although not too much lately... it's my Fall allergies time of year, AND then I got real sick with a cold so basically I've been feeling like shit, so Wikipedia is one of the last things I can deal with when I'm not 100%. I'm on the mend tho, so I'll slowly start poking my nose into everyone's bizness as the week goes on  :-) Hope you're doing well? - eo (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

SPI

Hi,
you don't need to manually list case pages on the main SPI page, we have a new bot taking care of that.
Thanks, Amalthea 12:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Annie Lennox Page Updates

Hi, I'd like to update Annie Lennox's page with new information about awards she has been presented recently. But am unable to do so with the page protection, as admin please can you grant access so I can add these details? The page is outdated without them. Thanks Turnipheadxox (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

I see someone responded on the article talk page and you've got it sorted. Thanks - eo (talk) 11:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Already Done It

Your suspicions are well founded. As always, a little bit more rope, and we'll know for certain who this is.—Kww(talk) 20:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Unusual You (Song)

THe discussion said that the article could be recreated if the song was released as a single. If the song had then it could have its own article. --Cprice1000talk2me 21:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera discography

YOU are editing and spreading a mess about there! Everything was right until some people started wanting to change things that are not needed! So, the 'vandal' are not me! And you have to PROVE if you want to warn! - Max Liron

The proof is right in your edit. The source provided gives sales of Stripped 12 million, and you changed it to 13 million.[1] If you continue to do this, you'll be blocked. You've been warned multiple times by multiple editors, and blanking messages from your Talk Page does not mean that they never happened. - eo (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Shame Shame Shame

Hi, can you verify please, if this title charted on US Dance at#23. That is the only detail I couldn't check so far, and the Billboard webpage doesn't work properly either. Thanks Uzerakount (talk) 21:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

the Shame Shame Shame chart entry was put in Peniston discography long ago I reconstructed the article, and as I couldn't find any further reference as for this only song, I was wondering where it comes from. However, it is one of the most successfull track she released during the last decade. Thank u for your time and work (m)anyway. Uzerakount (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that as for singles, I am done with all the credits/personnel (with exception of only three songs "Keep on Walkin' 2008 (EP Live), I'm in the Mood and Somebody Else's Guy), which I need to either check yet, or only complete. So if there is anybody please who could correct the overall "look" of credits, I will appreciate it. After a break I will hopefully complete also credits/personnel for Peniston's albums. At the moment I am really worn out myself... As for the charts, only Shame Shame Shame needs to be confirmed as discussed yesterday, and regarding the rest - all information was verified in detail. I was widely discussing the Peniston's milestones also with her producers, and was lucky to receive on my way also by now unreleased demos of her unfinished recordings from 2007 (all samples are provided at CCP discography main article). Thanks for help, learned heaps for sure, but it was a damn hard job, so i just hope it will be of some use. As I am not a native english speaker, would be appreciated as well if somebody checked also grammar in all CCP articles. Be well. Uzerakount (talk) 17:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Roman's Revenge

I noticed you removed this from the single list at Pink Friday, saying the source said nothing of the sort. You might wish to look again: the single is item #19. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

And the reason it wasn't sourced directly to the single was because the link redirects to the album. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Still does not prove that its a single. Looks to me like a pre-order teaser before the album is released - like a promotional tool, not a proper single release. This should be sourced by a record label's website, or Minaj's official site, not one online music retailer (iTunes). Even the "cover" shown is the album's not one specific to the song. Regardless, it fails WP:NSONG, in my opinion. I'd hold off on this one. - eo (talk) 20:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

68.84.94.69

I think this user needs to be blocked, since you're an admin I'm asking you to block this guy, because even after me and you warned him about his edits to Mary J. Blige discography he still undid your recent revision on that page and still won't listen no matter how much times he's been warned, it seems as if he'll never stop and the only thing we can do now is block him. Hometown Kid (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Gave him a final warning - Ill keep an eye on the IP and the article (on my watchlist) and Ill block if necessary. - eo (talk) 11:16, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Erasure single HIGIA ATTSFOOL.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Erasure single HIGIA ATTSFOOL.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Xtinadbest

Be on the lookout for accounts ending in "69". Take a quick peek at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Xtinadbest and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Xtinadbest and it will be obvious why.—Kww(talk) 14:44, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

I've been on the lookout, sorry for the late response. Between this person and Greenock it gets tiring! Two people with way too much time on their hands. - eo (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Rihanna discography at WP:FLRC

I have nominated Rihanna discography for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

I'm sorry, I should have notified you of this days ago. Matthewedwards :  Chat  21:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

number-one rock songs

Hi, we discussed the number one alternative songs, if you haven't already, i will start doing the ones for the Rock Songs article too, yea I know I shouldn't ask you for permission, just wondering if you did it! Thnaks!!! The Man Who Needs No Introduction! (talk) 20:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

N-Dubz discography

Hey, I need you to do something about this page. Can you put a semi-protection on it, because it's been repeatedly vandalized by some IP users. They keep altering the certifications for both albums and I left a private note warning them to stop and to obey the source, but they won't stop and won't listen because they keep ignoring the private note. Please put a semi-protection on that discography so that the stupid IP vandals will no longer trouble it, Thanks. Hometown Kid (talk) 09:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Done. - eo (talk) 14:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Wykonawcy

Possible, but there isn't enough data to act on. His chart position was good, just poorly referenced.—Kww(talk) 17:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Actually, he originally re-instated a "2" when it should have been "72", which he then corrected. - eo (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Blocked, reverted, and tagged.—Kww(talk) 20:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Nice. Thanks. - eo (talk) 20:53, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Far East Movement

Please stop removing references to Dubstep and Grime as musical influences for the far east movement. The beat structure and bpm speed at which the instrumental played indicates a Grime and Dubstep influence. Well known other hip hop artists from the US like P Diddy/Lil Jon have long been aware of this British Sub Genre and have borrowed instrumental elements for their own music. It is not a stretch of the imagination to imagine far east movement did the same... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nograviti (talk • contribs) 10:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This "stretch of imagination" is considered original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Genres are often subject to dispute, so reliable sourcing is necessary to avoid genre warring. Yves (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Err guys? The only edit I ever made to that article was this one: [2]. You're confusing me with someone else. - eo (talk) 15:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Brass Knuckles

I need you to put a semi-protection on that page also, some pesky IP vandals are messing around on it and not obeying the sources provide, plus they're ignoring the private note I left to warn them. Hometown Kid (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Done. - eo (talk) 15:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Hey :), please help reach consensus and vote here.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 05:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Cassidy discography

Alot of IP Vandals have been vandalizing this page lately, also need you to put a semi-protection on that so that they will no longer make bad edits to it, thanks Hometown Kid (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Done! - eo (talk) 12:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Rodolfo Trotter

Just wondering, have you come across Rodolfo Trotter (talk · contribs)? The user's edits come across very TrEeMaNsHoE-ish to me. — ξ^xplicit 03:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, to me also. Either that or CiaraFan4Ever. I'd ask Kww or bring this to checkuser ASAP. - eo (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Why Don't You Love Me

Please participate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Why_Don't_You_Love_Me_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song)#Single.3F Jivesh boodhun (talk) 06:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)